waveparticle
About
- Banned
- Username
- waveparticle
- Joined
- Visits
- 34
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,145
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,497
Reactions
-
Apple shifted orders from Foxconn to Luxshare to assist $275B China deal
Western nations especially the five eyes misunderstand Chinese history. Taiwan is a part of China. That is the claim by China. According to this premise if China reunite Taiwan then Taiwan is a part of China. Why would China persecute TSMC?GeorgeBMac said:9secondkox2 said:Hope TSMC is watching.Apple is hurting Taiwan based Foxconn tremendously here.Next, China will start a chip foundry and pressure Apple into shifting their processors there. Short of military terrorism and attempted takeover against Taiwan, China will use strong arm market tactics. Actually, thanks to Apples compliance, they already are.TSMC should consider leaning more into the Intel partnership and others. That will hedge against catastrophe should Apple pull another fast one.China already has chip factories. But they're growing them at record rates to defend themselves against foolish, counter-productive American sanctions.As for Taiwan, they don't have to take it. It's already theirs. it's been theirs. But yeh, they'll do what they need to do to keep it from splitting off -- just as the U.S. did when some of our territories tried the same.
The western mentality is to deny Taiwan as a part of China. China think western nations are splitting Taiwan from China. According to the western theory, since Taiwan is not a part of China. China wants to hurt Taiwan and TSMC. Do you see the contradictions of these two thoughts?
The sad truth is Taiwan is now ruled by separatists party DPP. DPP try to coerce western nations into thinking Taiwan is an independent nation. The same as Uyguirs separatists are doing.
-
Apple shifted orders from Foxconn to Luxshare to assist $275B China deal
This is bs propaganda! Why would a nation busy producing goods for the world plan to attack in the future? Only a hateful person will use this kind of logic.AppleUfmyI said:Just pull all manufacturer out of China. They will use the money we pay them to build their military and attack us at some point in time. We are stupid to think otherwise. All they have to do now is claim ownership of an American company in China and take it and all it’s assets and IP over and we are powerless to do anything. But the shareholders will cry and ask our average American sons and daughters in the military will be asked to step up and ensure the .1 of 1%-ters keep their share. We should never have enrich our advisories for profit and we never ever should have exported our superior computer technology around the world giving up our supremacy. Gloomy picture, I know. But the world is run by a few greedy families and its all legal and very obfuscated. -
Apple shifted orders from Foxconn to Luxshare to assist $275B China deal
Maybe Cook can help India expand its local technology industry?
-
Foxconn India workers beset by worms in food, no running water
The fact of the truth lies in where these worms come from? -
Foxconn must improve living conditions for workers at shuttered iPhone plant
Those workers are not Apple employees legally. Morally maybe. What is happening in India and China is a path of developing nations to become developed. This is completed when they are industrialized. Without enough basic living resources like shoes, clothes for the poor, the human rights standard in the highly developed nations is pie in the sky.GeorgeBMac said:the1maximus said:This is probably just ignorance on my part, or maybe it’s because I’m use to the way we do things here in The States.
Why would Apple or Foxconn have to deal with the living conditions of the workers in their factories? Are living arrangements part of the agreement for employment? I feel this article should have at least explained this, just so we have some more context.Effectively, those workers are Apple employees. Foxconn is essentially just a contractor or middleman. So, Apple holds some degree of responsibility for those employees.The U.S. practiced worker abuse until Roosevelt strengthened regulations to protect American workers. Since then, stopping abuse of workers has become a cornerstone of our democracy. If we are to hold to our principles, worker protections against abuse by American companies do not stop when that American company operates in other countries.