elijahg
About
- Username
- elijahg
- Joined
- Visits
- 362
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,225
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 2,759
Reactions
-
iMac 24-inch M3 review: A clear sign that Intel Mac support is ending soon
jonamac said:Mike Wuerthele said:jonamac said:Is there any logic to that headline whatsoever? What about this iMac is a clear sign of intel support going away??? -
iMac 24-inch M3 review: A clear sign that Intel Mac support is ending soon
-
Apple rumored to launch new Macs in October
22july2013 said:What I want is better NE (Neural Engine) core speeds, because my software seems to be bound by the speed of the NEs. (It's hard to be sure, since the Apple Activity Monitor in macOS doesn't tell you about the NE load.) Here's what Apple's processors claim to have:11 trillion ops/sec -- M1
15.8 trillion ops/sec --M2 Pro, M2 Max, M2, A15
17 trillion ops/sec -- A16
22 trillion ops/sec -- M1 Ultra (apparently 2x the M1 speed because the M1 Ultra is 2 M1 cores tied together. I'm not sure if real world performance scales perfectly.)
31.6 trillion ops/sec -- M2 Ultra (apparently 2x the M2 speed because the M2 Ultra is 2 M2 cores tied together. I'm not sure if real world performance scales perfectly.)
Looking at this data, there was a 40% speed bump from M1 to M2, which is definitely okay, but the other increases were caused only from doubling the number of Mx/NE cores. I'm hoping the M3 chip has a true speed bump, in which case I'm likely to replace my M1 Mac with an M3 Mac.
Does anyone know of any software that can show me the load on my Neural Engines? Does anyone know why Apple's Activity Monitor refrains from reporting that data? -
Larger 32-inch iMac Pro rumored to hit store shelves in late 2024
Is all that R&D spending going into Vision Pro? Because it's definitely not going into Apple's now singular AIO desktop. The M1 iMac has been out for 2.5 years, whilst the M2 has now been around for 18 months. Apple has had 18 months to put the M2 into the iMac but for some reason hasn't, despite all the previous handwringing that Intel was the reason Mac updates began to slow.
I can only think Apple was hoping to jump straight to the M3 for the iMac in ~October 2022, much like they were rumoured to for the Mac Pro, but as it was delayed they ended up with nothing for the iMac and a Mac Pro that appears to be a bodge. -
iPhone 15 has new battery health controls to prevent charging past 80%
Actually... Most wear to lithium batteries is in the topping charge (80%+). Preventing the battery exceeding 80% does genuinely increase battery lifetime quite significantly. If a user doesn't discharge their battery to <20% by the end of the day, there is no point in charging it to 100% and causing more wear. Better to use the lower 0-80% than the upper 20-100%. This is why Apple limits the charge to 80% as much as possible at night, which is a relatively small proportion of time, but the battery improvement is enough that they deem it worth it.
I hope this comes to older iPhones too.