blurpbleepbloop

Interesting that most folks jumped on the “classic” term being (mis)applied here. For me, what jumped out was “free”. Free, with subscription, isn’t really free.
More appropriate to say Apple has added 51 movies to their catalog of shows and movies, which we already know are for subscribers only.

Yeah, they better get a move on. I saw a long line of parents who were eager to strap $4000 (after all is said and done) to their 10 yo’s face.

ihatescreennames said:

avon b7 said:

This is Apple getting high on its own delusions.

It's understandable but still ridiculous. 

Anybody that thinks only 'they' could do something really needs to rethink things. 

I’m pretty sure they are correct when they say only Apple could have created the Apple Vision Pro.

Right? They own the trademark on Apple. Duh. 🥸

chasm said:

blurpbleepbloop said:

“In total, Apple has identified XX shopping apps that will be native at launch” I only counted IV or V in the list. Not close to XX apps.

As the article clearly states, these are the apps that have appeared BEFORE the launch. The product hasn’t launched yet, so the Vision Pro App Store is not yet available, so we don’t have the full list yet.

Sorry if you missed that. Check back in a few days once some of the AI staff get their AVPs and can investigate the VP App Store once it opens.

The original article was edited to remove the XX that I quoted which was clearly meant to be a placeholder for an actual count of apps due to the intro lead “In total,”. But rather than provide the count, the author removed the XX but quizzically left in the lead which begs for an actual count. Makes me think they used ChatGPT to assemble the article and didn’t actually read it.

Anyway, I suppose my attempt at sarcastic humor fell flat in intimating that the author intended to use Roman numerals all along. Sorry if you missed that.

“In total, Apple has identified XX shopping apps that will be native at launch” I only counted IV or V in the list. Not close to XX apps.