blurpbleepbloop

What you need to order Apple Vision Pro from Apple Store online? A healthy bank account and quite a bit of optimism.

I know it’s not a big city or anything, but it’s Los Angeles, not Las Angeles.  I should know, I live near Son Francisco. . I mean, my son, Francisco, who lives in Los Angeles.

Yeah, we don’t need this.

At least I certainly don’t want to be tracked throughout my home just for the possibility that my home automation might be a wee bit helpful but in all likelihood it would just be annoying or wrong.

Apple will continue to charge outrageous amounts for its top end gear as long as there are people willing to hand over their cash.  Count me out, I don’t need the status symbol to be happy.

“You can be reasonably assured that if somebody is spending their time to disseminate facts for free, it's most likely a contradiction of reality.”

Absolutely the best line in the article.

Thanks for setting the record straight.

ihatescreennames said:

avon b7 said:

This is Apple getting high on its own delusions.

It's understandable but still ridiculous. 

Anybody that thinks only 'they' could do something really needs to rethink things. 

I’m pretty sure they are correct when they say only Apple could have created the Apple Vision Pro.

Right? They own the trademark on Apple. Duh. 🥸

davidmalcolm said:

macxpress said:

Afarstar said:

I want M3 iMac - NOW!

What is an M3 Mac going to do what the current ones don't? 

Be supported for two more years.
With Sonoma, Apple just dropped support for the Intel iMacs that came out in 2017 which means the oldest iMacs that can run Sonoma are the 2019 models which is kind of insane. 

This really is one of the biggest issues with Apple’s release cadence. These 2017 Mac’s are functionally equivalent to the 2018/2019 models with small CPU change for most models but they are now disallowed to run the latest OS.
These recent ‘discounts’ on Apple’s 2+ years old M1 Macs would be much more attractive if the supported timeline was not truncated by the same number of years.

I give Apple an “A” for the cojones to market this as a feature. As said here in a previous post, the new position makes it appear a bit more like a UI element instead of dead space - but it is a trick. It obviously would still be better to not have this screen real estate interrupted by the camera/sensor assembly - though that is obviously easier said than done when Apple (and other phone mfg) want to market an edge to edge screen.

Yeah, they better get a move on. I saw a long line of parents who were eager to strap $4000 (after all is said and done) to their 10 yo’s face.

I would think that Apple is going to introduce this thing with Craig Federighi appearing with some oversized headset that he then peals off to reveal the slim profile of Apple’s offering.
I’ll be so sad if this isn’t the case.