genovelle

About

Username
genovelle
Joined
Visits
79
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,875
Badges
2
Posts
1,481
  • Apple Music eclipses Spotify in paid US subscribers

    HenryDJP said:
    tylersdad said:
    Do these paid subscribers include people like me who get Apple Music for free through Verizon?
    I would say perhaps not. Firstly not everyone has Verizon  and not everyone has an unlimited data plan which is required to get the Apple Music promo that only last 6 months anyway. 
    Not anymore. They’ve extended it indefinitely as long as your plan is active.  
    cornchip
  • Apple's control over the App Store now 'completely unsustainable,' says Spotify CEO

    normm said:
    I think this is the same issue as net neutrality.  If you are a dominant platform on the internet, there should be rules about not favoring your own content.  I actually think it's short sighted of Apple to take such a large cut from major services that enhance their devices.  For example, not being able to buy Kindle books in the Kindle App just makes the iPhone that much less useful.  Perhaps a solution would be for Apple to tier its subscription revenue, so that when services grow large enough they take a much smaller cut.
    So going to the Amazon app is too
    much work for you?  😢
    Apple does take a smaller cut after the account has been active for a certain period. It goes from 30% to 15%. 
    AppleExposed
  • Elizabeth Warren calls for tech giant breakup, with Apple in the cross-hairs

    On Friday, Democratic Senator and 2020 presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren advocated for breaking up major tech companies with large services, specifically naming Amazon, Facebook, and Google -- but Apple fits in the targeted category as well.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren


    Warren's platform calls for "passing legislation that requires large tech platforms to be designated as 'Platform Utilities' and broken apart from any participant on that platform," according to a pitch for the idea on Medium.

    "Platform utilities" subject to mandated break-up would be defined as "companies with an annual global revenue of $25 billion or more and that offer to the public an online marketplace, an exchange, or a platform for connecting third parties." Such businesses would be prevented from "owning both the platform utility and any participants on that platform" or sharing data with third parties. They would also have to "meet a standard of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory dealing with users."

    Warren's post specifically targets Amazon, Facebook, and Google by name. Warren highlights Amazon's dominance in e-commerce and the fact that over 70 percent of all internet traffic passes through sites operated by Google or Facebook.

    "As these companies have grown larger and more powerful, they have used their resources and control over the way we use the Internet to squash small businesses and innovation, and substitute their own financial interests for the broader interests of the American people," she wrote. "To restore the balance of power in our democracy, to promote competition, and to ensure that the next generation of technology innovation is as vibrant as the last, it's time to break up our biggest tech companies."

    By definition, Warren's proposed policies would also impact Apple. The company obviously exceeds $25 billion in annual revenue, qualifying it as a "Platform utility" for income. The App Store offers apps like Spotify, Pandora, and Netflix, but those are forced to compete with services like Apple Music and iTunes, which come pre-installed on every Apple device. Apple also claims a cut from every App Store transaction, even if it's merely a subscription to outside content.

    The senator's proposal has long-running U.S. precedent. Warren pointed to Microsoft, which in the '90s was hit by an antitrust case that loosened its control on Web browsers. Going further back, the breakups of monopolies by AT&T, J.P. Morgan, and Standard Oil were instrumental in establishing the modern business landscape.

    Apple has regularly been hit with antitrust actions, such as the one that penalized it $400 million for conspiring with book publishers, and another involving the App Store, which recently made an appearance at the U.S. Supreme Court. The company has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, even as judges, lawyers, and other critics point out that the App Store is the only sanctioned place iPhone and iPad owners can get software. Apple has said this ensures a base level of quality and safety.
    The book store issue was orchestrated by Amazon. They held a true monopoly and the model Apple was using stood to break that monopoly. Excellent lobbying by the corporate darling, loves because they gave other people’s property away and who was crushing creatives and publishers by devaluing their products. Why would the courts have a say in what kind of model any industry uses. It’s the quivalent of the courts blocking streaming because Apple complained about downloads loosing steam. 
    cornchipwatto_cobramagman1979badmonk
  • Trump calls Apple CEO Tim Cook 'Tim Apple' at advisory meeting

    I love the way he claims responsibility for Apple starting to build things here. Considering they have been talking about it and building the Mac Pro here since 2013. 
    gilly33zroger73HenryDJPneo-techlolliverStrangeDaysSolihcrefugeebaconstangchasm
  • How to create, read, and mark up PDFs on an iPad or iPhone with Apple's tools in iOS

    radamo said:
    Where is the ability to "Sign" a pdf?  Did I miss something?
    It’s in the markup tool and has been there for almost over a year and a half. It was added in IOS 11. You can sign a PDF by using your finger and a pen in the markup section or better yet if you are a Mac user and already use the signature feature there, you saved signatures will be available to you under signatures. You can even add new ones. I even marked up the screen shoot a bit  
    redgeminiparadamowatto_cobra