thanx_al
About
- Username
- thanx_al
- Joined
- Visits
- 27
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 272
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 70
Reactions
-
Facebook app accesses iPhone camera without user's knowledge
-
Editorial: Steve Jobs shared secrets of Apple's iPad but nobody listened
lmac said:One of DED's favorite forms of storytelling is rewriting history to make Apple and Jobs seem to have thought of everything, but let's remember that we don't write articles about flops. You never see DED defending the genius of Ping, the iTunes social network, or the Apple HiFi. Still, there are lots of things in this article that qualify as spin, or that are just plain false. 1) When the iPad came out, people were stunned that it was just a scaled up phone that couldn't make phone calls, and not a more capable device. They were correct about its early limitations. 2) The product name almost sunk the launch, with people comparing it to feminine hygiene products. 3) The predicted dominance of the eBook and magazine industry never came to pass. 4) Jobs totally missed the importance of the App Store and 3rd party apps, which came later, and really had much to do with the success of the device. 5) Job's insistence that a stylus and keyboard were unnecessary have since been reversed, so which is it? Is Apple on the wrong track today, or did Jobs get it wrong in the beginning? 6) The iPad push into the K12 classroom as a textbook replacement is over. Schools are replacing aging iPads with Chromebooks that cost less, are more rugged, easier to manage, and simply do more. 7) The one big thing Apple got right was to make the iPad the best tablet money can buy, and to keep making incremental improvements. Staying above the low-end competition is what Apple always does, but it paid off because the low end Android and Amazon tablets are clunky, sluggish, and non-intuitive in comparison.
"That included its experience in building mobile devices and app platforms, but also its humbling failures from past mistakes: trying to invent the distant future, taking too long to complete a sellable product, lacking a clear use case for it, and failing to deliver new refinements at a regular clip."
-or-"Back in the late 80s, Apple had experimented with a PenLite tablet Mac that was effectively just a screen with a pen. That design was far too expensive to build, forcing Apple to scale its mobile ideas down into a notepad it could sell for less than $2000. Newton was still too expensive, "
Did any of your six things lead to the epic lop of iPad? Or do you see Galaxy Tabs or whatever they're called everywhere? -
Apple releases first beta for macOS Catalina 10.15.2
-
A4 to A5: How Apple outflanked its fragmented competition in silicon
Pointing out that the mini contradicted Jobs statement misses the point. The mini wasn't produced because it was a great size. It was produced to squeeze value out of the previous gen chips, something that DED alluded to earlier in the article. At that point in time, there was no pro and 9.7" was locked in everyone's mind as the reference size for iPad. The only way to create another vehicle for older chips was to downsize. Additionally, iPad mini has never been a sales beast. It's there to squeeze value out of the recent or last gen chips to increase the economy of scale. Apple is doing this all over the place now (which is probably why current iPad, iPad Air, iPad mini exist at all - to leverage past investments in those chips). -
AirPods Pro use custom silicone ear-tip, basically non-repairable