Steve Jobs admits Apple tried to buy AdMob, warns of porn on Android
During a question-and-answer session following Thursday's iPhone OS 4.0 preview, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs admitted that Apple tried to buy AdMob before Google "snatched" them, and also cited a pornography store for the Android operating system as a reason why unsigned apps are not allowed on the iPhone.
Jobs specifically said that his company "tried" to buy AdMob to no avail. That confirms numerous reports that claimed Apple and AdMob were in talks before Google acquired the mobile advertising firm for $750 million. Jobs characterized Google's acquisition by saying the search giant "snatched" AdMob away from Apple.
A recent report from The New York Times profiling the rivalry between Apple and Google said that the search engine willingly overpaid for AdMob just to keep the company away from Apple. Soon after the deal between Google and AdMob was struck, Apple responded by acquiring competing mobile ad firm Quattro Wireless.
That purchase of Quattro paved the way for Apple to announce iAd on Thursday, a new full-featured advertising service that allows interactive content within iPhone applications without launching a browser.
Also during Thursday's Q&A session, Jobs was asked if Apple has any intention of allowing unsigned applications to run in the iPhone OS. Currently, all third-party software must be approved by Apple for sale on the App Store.
Jobs responded to Ryan Block of gdgt by noting that there is a "porn store" for Google's Android mobile operating system, Apple's chief competitor in the mobile device and application space. "You can download it, your kids can download it," the CEO said. "That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to."
Other notes of interest from the Q&A session, which also featured senior vice presidents Scott Forstall, iPhone software, and Phil Schiller, worldwide product marketing:
Jobs said he does not believe that multitasking will lead to increased data usage. He said that streaming applications like Pandora just don't use that much in the way of data.
The iPad is still on track for an international launch in late April.
The iAds service will have some boundaries, and there will be some advertisements that will not be allowed.
Jobs answered succinctly when asked if Apple had changed its position on Adobe Flash or Java: "No."
Forstall said Apple believes that push notifications are the best way of handling applications for IM and Twitter.
When asked if widgets could be coming to the iPad, Jobs said that "anything is possible."
Features like multitasking are not available on earlier devices because the hardware simply couldn't support it. Older hardware will still get the upgrade, but it will be lacking features like multitasking, which was only announced for the iPhone 3GS (summer), third-gen iPod touch (summer), and iPad (this fall).
Jobs specifically said that his company "tried" to buy AdMob to no avail. That confirms numerous reports that claimed Apple and AdMob were in talks before Google acquired the mobile advertising firm for $750 million. Jobs characterized Google's acquisition by saying the search giant "snatched" AdMob away from Apple.
A recent report from The New York Times profiling the rivalry between Apple and Google said that the search engine willingly overpaid for AdMob just to keep the company away from Apple. Soon after the deal between Google and AdMob was struck, Apple responded by acquiring competing mobile ad firm Quattro Wireless.
That purchase of Quattro paved the way for Apple to announce iAd on Thursday, a new full-featured advertising service that allows interactive content within iPhone applications without launching a browser.
Also during Thursday's Q&A session, Jobs was asked if Apple has any intention of allowing unsigned applications to run in the iPhone OS. Currently, all third-party software must be approved by Apple for sale on the App Store.
Jobs responded to Ryan Block of gdgt by noting that there is a "porn store" for Google's Android mobile operating system, Apple's chief competitor in the mobile device and application space. "You can download it, your kids can download it," the CEO said. "That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to."
Other notes of interest from the Q&A session, which also featured senior vice presidents Scott Forstall, iPhone software, and Phil Schiller, worldwide product marketing:
Jobs said he does not believe that multitasking will lead to increased data usage. He said that streaming applications like Pandora just don't use that much in the way of data.
The iPad is still on track for an international launch in late April.
The iAds service will have some boundaries, and there will be some advertisements that will not be allowed.
Jobs answered succinctly when asked if Apple had changed its position on Adobe Flash or Java: "No."
Forstall said Apple believes that push notifications are the best way of handling applications for IM and Twitter.
When asked if widgets could be coming to the iPad, Jobs said that "anything is possible."
Features like multitasking are not available on earlier devices because the hardware simply couldn't support it. Older hardware will still get the upgrade, but it will be lacking features like multitasking, which was only announced for the iPhone 3GS (summer), third-gen iPod touch (summer), and iPad (this fall).
Comments
Jobs answered succinctly when asked if Apple had changed its position on Adobe Flash or Java: "No."
What a question... I'm confidant that if Apple had reversed its policy they would have made it quite apparent. So the person asking it was either totally ignorant or was simply fishing for a way to write a 'fresh' news article detailing the fact that Apple doesn't provide support for FLASH.
...and in other news... Gravity is STILL in FULL effect, film at 11.
Are you guys taking small pieces of today's session and generating multiple little special interest stories? If so, how did Jobs look? Was the room clean, did it smell good? How about an article on the font used in the keynote.
What a question... I'm confidant that if Apple had reversed its policy they would have made it quite apparent. So the person asking it was either totally ignorant or was simply fishing for a way to write a 'fresh' news article detailing the fact that Apple doesn't provide support for FLASH.
...and in other news... Gravity is STILL in FULL effect, film at 11.
Apple invariably gets a few "are you still beating your wife" questions from some of the snarkier websites, who are pretty much in it for the smirks.
Are you guys taking small pieces of today's session and generating multiple little special interest stories? If so, how did Jobs look? Was the room clean, did it smell good? How about an article on the font used in the keynote.
I see nothing wrong with running stories on specific content covered in the keynote... After all A LOT was covered and trying to hold meaningful forum discussions on specific topics in the 'main keynote article' isn't working very well. We can bash AI for lots of things but I for one am giving them some slack on this one...
Are you guys taking small pieces of today's session and generating multiple little special interest stories? If so, how did Jobs look? Was the room clean, did it smell good? How about an article on the font used in the keynote.
Give these guys a break. They live and die by pageview counts.
Frankly, it's better from a commenting standpoint to break out the main topics. It (hopefully) keeps the conversation more focused.
As we already know, some of the fanboys here start ranting about the lack of MacBook Pro upgrades in iPad threads. At least with multiple threads, the complainers are spread out thinner.
Features like multitasking are not available on earlier devices because the hardware simply couldn't support it. Older hardware will still get the upgrade, but it will be lacking features like multitasking, which was only announced for the iPhone 3GS.
Not true - the current generation iPod Touch will get multitasking, as will the iPad (though not until the fall for the iPad).
.
And now we have a new derisive term for Android: "Porndroid". The best way to to pwn your mobile pr0n.
Give these guys a break. They live and die by pageview counts.
Frankly, it's better from a commenting standpoint to break out the main topics. It (hopefully) keeps the conversation more focused.
You mean like iPhone 4.0 will not support Flash? That will be refreshing. I can't wait.
I love everything that comes out of Steve's mouth. Android is now known as the Porn phone. Nice jab!
You mean like iPhone 4.0 will not support Flash? That will be refreshing. I can't wait.
You don't need to wait. It's already been here for years.
Jobs responded to Ryan Block of gdgt by noting that there is a "porn store" for Google's Android mobile operating system, Apple's chief competitor in the mobile device and application space. "You can download it, your kids can download it," the CEO said. "That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to."
BRAVO APPLE BRAVO!!!!
(That's why Safari is there)
A porn store on Android "that your kids can get to".
I love everything that comes out of Steve's mouth. Android is now known as the Porn phone. Nice jab!
The iPhone has that feature as well. It's called Safari. Open it up, type in any porn website and away you go!
Steve kind of failed to mention that didn't he?
And I like how he side-stepped the question itself. This just in folks! All unsigned apps must be porn! Steve Jobs says it's so!
Don't get me wrong, I have respect for the man, but come on...
The iPhone has that feature as well. It's called Safari. Open it up, type in any porn website and away you go!
Steve kind of failed to mention that didn't he?
Up next: Apple iChina. An easy to use, non-configurable firewall that blocks sites that Apple doesn't want you to see!
I do understand that there's a difference between selling the stuff and allowing you to access it. I'm just pointing out that it doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to see there is a slippery slope.
What a question... I'm confidant that if Apple had reversed its policy they would have made it quite apparent. So the person asking it was either totally ignorant or was simply fishing for a way to write a 'fresh' news article detailing the fact that Apple doesn't provide support for FLASH.
...and in other news... Gravity is STILL in FULL effect, film at 11.
Have you had any significant gravitational fluctuations yet?
A porn store on Android "that your kids can get to".
I love everything that comes out of Steve's mouth. Android is now known as the Porn phone. Nice jab!
Good thing nobody told Steve that porn is readily accessible on mobile Safari. There are probably even iPhone optimized sites. Then he would have had to remove Safari altogether. The Disneyfication of Apple continues unabated.
The iPhone has that feature as well. It's called Safari. Open it up, type in any porn website and away you go!
Steve kind of failed to mention that didn't he?
And I like how he side-stepped the question itself. This just in folks! All unsigned apps must be porn! Steve Jobs says it's so!
Don't get me wrong, I have respect for the man, but come on...
Or you can read it as: hey if you open your store to unsigned apps, then it can be really distracting to many of our customers. Many of our customers are young children who have iPod Touches, we want our devices to be family friendly, unsigned apps are the doorway to porn apps, we will not risk everything for some people.
I love everything that comes out of Steve's mouth. Android is now known as the Porn phone. Nice jab!
And every 14 year old boy in the country is now trying to convince his parents to buy him one - for the articles!
Jobs responded to Ryan Block of gdgt by noting that there is a "porn store" for Google's Android mobile operating system, Apple's chief competitor in the mobile device and application space. "You can download it, your kids can download it," the CEO said. "That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to."
Mr. Jobs, I can only highly commend you for that.