Apple reveals new cloud-centric Apple TV

2456719

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 378
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member
    I think they got the hardware right but not the software. 1 x power, 1 x HDMI, 1 x Ethernet/Wireless = great.



    But the software! I was so excited to hear Steve say "People don't want a computer in their living room." But then the demo starts, and there's this whole row of menus with submenus, and I straight away knew this would remain a hobby.



    The software should have been as simple as the hardware. You plug it in and it straight away shows a Coverflow of all the movies available for rent. And that's the whole interface.



    But why so simple? Because when will people understand, the TV is for blobbing out! It's the one place in this hectic world that you don't have to think. And here come these tech companies, trying to add multi-layer menus to the only blob-out place we have left.
  • Reply 22 of 378
    daharderdaharder Posts: 1,580member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mjtomlin View Post


    Well, I don't have a DVR or even cable for that matter... so, if you had an open mind or an imagination you could see how this device would be useful to some people.



    Also at $0.99 I could rent the two weekly tv shows I'd like to watch for $8 a month and not have to pay for 100+ channels of crap I wouldn't ever watch.



    Good For You... Enjoy
  • Reply 23 of 378
    It's only like your DVR only if you religiously record every episode that you (or your friends) might someday want to watch and your DVR storage is unlimited. AppleTV gives you instant access to shows that you may not be interested in today, but might be next year, even if the show is no longer on the air.
  • Reply 24 of 378
    I really don't like the direction things are moving in......used to be able to actually buy CD's which had better quality sound.....now you download them and hope your drive doesn't crash or they change the DRM requirements bricking your library overnight.



    Used to be able to go to a store and buy a DVD.....now you rent them and forever lose the benefit of actually owning the item. If all we could do is rent you'd never be able to see the unaltered versions of Stars Wars or see ET before Spielberg changed the guns to lollypops.....any film considered controversial or subversive might not be available at all or would be edited etc.



    We are slowly giving away our rights.
  • Reply 25 of 378
    I'll probably get it because of the new $99 price and that I use handbrake to import my DVDs to my Mac, but it does nothing to get me away from physical media. If don't have you DVDs ripped to your hard drive or already buy from iTunes, I see no reason to but this at all. There are much better options out there.



    1) Red Box good. No Hulu integration bad. Apple contract service would be better, but not while jobs is alive since he seems to be deathly allergic to them.



    2) Apple seems oblivious to the fact that the kiosks are the competition in the rental space, no high priced video on demand. I'm not lazy enough were I'd pay $5 to rent from Apple when I take a five minute trip to Walgreens to rent the Blu-Ray for $1.50 from Red Box. There seems to be a disconnect when it comes to the video space that wasn't there with music. Then again, with Steve's comments a couple months back I don't know if they fully understand the reasons that digital music took off.
  • Reply 26 of 378
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 18,027member
    My first thought was that I might actually be interested at $99. Then, I thought again. It's a $99 wireless hub and that's all. I don't care about renting TV shows or movies through iTunes. I have Netflix on my PS3, giving me Bluray+streaming+gaming. I also have a multi-room DVR. I can rent movies if I choose through FiOs.



    I think Apple is really going the wrong way here. Introduce an Apple TV with bluray, multi-DVR and physical media storage of 1-2TB. Charge $599 + $99 for satellite (other room) boxes like the current (new) Apple TV. Goodbye $40 a month charge for three boxes. I'm sold.
  • Reply 27 of 378
    sheffsheff Posts: 1,407member
    I might actually buy an Apple TV now. Amazing price point, great show prices. Amazing kaynote overall!
  • Reply 28 of 378
    kotatsukotatsu Posts: 1,010member
    Just saw the pricing too. US - $99. UK - £99.



    Since when was the exchange rate $1=£1? I know Apple always screw us over here in the UK, but this is a new low point.
  • Reply 29 of 378
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by utnvols1 View Post


    Sounds like glorified hotel room PPV to me...



    One that can steam content you have from you computers, but basically yeah.
  • Reply 30 of 378
    I already have a SlimDevices Squeezebox that cost me $250. But for $100 the aTV can do a whole lot more. And I often use my Wii to show slideshows straight off SD cards after taking pictures. aTV can display anything in my iPhoto library.



    I think the aTV is going on my Christmas list - and maybe on the gift list for some relatives.



    I'd love to see the hardware specs on the aTV and eagerly await what the jailbreakers can do with it.



    - Jasen.
  • Reply 31 of 378
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DaHarder View Post


    Cool device overall, but it's a bit nonsensical to expect users to 'rent' TV episodes for US .99 (at only 720p) when it's so easy to simply use a DVR/Tivo type device.



    True, but since it streams from mac you can still buy episodes in iTunes, use a tivo device in a mac or PC, or any other way that is available to download the episode. And streaming netflix is huge, although I'd love to see more streaming options like ABC, hulu, etc.





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ortal View Post


    I was gonna say, isnt this just a glorified DVR? and on those you can keep the episode indefinetly, no?



    Can you get a dvr that includes streaming for $99?
  • Reply 32 of 378
    sandorsandor Posts: 665member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post


    My first thought was that I might actually be interested at $99. Then, I thought again. It's a $99 wireless hub and that's all. I don't care about renting TV shows or movies through iTunes. I have Netflix on my PS3, giving me Bluray+streaming+gaming. I also have a multi-room DVR. I can rent movies if I choose through FiOs.



    I think Apple is really going the wrong way here. Introduce an Apple TV with bluray, multi-DVR and physical media storage of 1-2TB. Charge $599 + $99 for satellite (other room) boxes like the current (new) Apple TV. Goodbye $40 a month charge for three boxes. I'm sold.







    what content can be streamed from other iOS devices?



    can the Netflix app stream to the AppleTV? Does your iPhone become the remote + apps for the AppleTV?
  • Reply 33 of 378
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by pondosinatra View Post


    I really don't like the direction things are moving in......used to be able to actually buy CD's which had better quality sound.....now you download them and hope your drive doesn't crash or they change the DRM requirements bricking your library overnight.



    Used to be able to go to a store and buy a DVD.....now you rent them and forever lose the benefit of actually owning the item. If all we could do is rent you'd never be able to see the unaltered versions of Stars Wars or see ET before Spielberg changed the guns to lollypops.....any film considered controversial or subversive might not be available at all or would be edited etc.



    We are slowly giving away our rights.



    There is no DRM on iTunes songs. That was like 2007. And you can still buy CDs. Go to Best Buy. They have tons of them. Still have DVDs too. And a bunch of other options for video besides Apple. Do you get out much?
  • Reply 34 of 378
    I predict this product is going to be a BLOCKBUSTER.



    @TV will finally take off.



    Note: I don't think he called it iTV.
  • Reply 35 of 378
    Damn they could have atleast thrown a DVD player in it, for people with a DVD player and Roku to go down to 1 device. Theres just absolutely no reason to buy this thing.
  • Reply 36 of 378
    herbapouherbapou Posts: 2,228member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ascii View Post


    I think they got the hardware right but not the software. 1 x power, 1 x HDMI, 1 x Ethernet/Wireless = great.



    But the software! I was so excited to hear Steve say "People don't want a computer in their living room." But then the demo starts, and there's this whole row of menus with submenus, and I straight away knew this would remain a hobby.



    I have the old one and imo the interface is pretty brain dead simple. Sync where a bit more complex but they are gone so its even more simple.



    lack of an open app system is the problem here.
  • Reply 37 of 378
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ascii View Post


    The software should have been as simple as the hardware. You plug it in and it straight away shows a Coverflow of all the movies available for rent. And that's the whole interface.





    ... don't quit your day job if you're thinking about going into UI design!
  • Reply 38 of 378
    Think about it! Why spend $99 for a Roku box when you can get this PLUS iTunes streaming plus rental movies. It makes absolute sense. They are going after the 1Mu+ Roku market.
  • Reply 39 of 378
    cmf2cmf2 Posts: 1,427member
    Disappointed that it doesn't have apps, but I'd forgive them if airplay lets me stream video from non apple sources on my iPhone to apple tv.
  • Reply 40 of 378
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,687member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AsianBob View Post


    It seems like Apple TV is still just "iTunes for TV" ...



    Bingo! That's all it ever was. I don't understand why people don't get that!? It's really not that difficult of a concept: You have iTunes content on your computer and you want to watch it on your TV in the living room.



    Honestly, what's with all the whining?
Sign In or Register to comment.