RIM admits it was behind 'Wake Up' mock protest

1246

Comments

  • Reply 61 of 107
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 18,020member


    Wow.  Really, Research in Motion....REALLY?  You send people out with signs to "protest" at an Apple store and mock its customers?  For realz?  

  • Reply 62 of 107
    haarhaar Posts: 563member
    futuristic wrote: »
    <p>  </p><div class="quote-container"> <span>Quote:</span> <div class="quote-block"> Originally Posted by <strong>jmgregory1</strong> <a href="/t/149750/rim-admits-it-was-behind-wake-up-mock-protest#post_2103244"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" /></a><br /> <br /> <p> Maybe it could be a successful campaign if RIM is talking about themselves - that they are the one in need of waking up (from the nightmare that has been the past 5 years since the iPhone was launched).</p> <p>  </p> <p> In this already thinning marketplace, where Apple and Android rule, while even MS fights to remain viable, RIM has what I suspect is an insurmountable challenge in front of it.  They'd need to have the perfect storm of great OS with no issues, big uptake by developers and a way to stem the tide of defectors, even among the [boneheaded] financial and political communities and some competitive, if not groundbreaking, new hardware.  I'm not a betting man, but the odds are really not in their favor given the misses they've had on all fronts the past few years.</p> <p>  </p> <p> It's not like they've all of a sudden had that "aha" moment and now they're going to right all the wrongs they've had. Sure, they've chopped the head off the monster, but what they're left with isn't going to be great or maybe even good.  It would take years to get things not just up to speed but ahead of any competitor if they could hire some creative engineers.</p> </div></div><p> I mostly agree with you, though, this was also said of Apple in the late 90s. Even I, as a loyal Mac user, was feeling the hurt (wish I'd bought stock then!), and now Apple is the biggest company in the world. So, strange things <em>can</em> happen. But, for Apple, it took a truly visionary leader, and powerful, driven team to make it happen. I think part of Apple's success is driven by the passion of the Apple folks. Apple is not <em>just</em> a company they work for, it's part of who they are. Yes, some executives and employees have been lured away by other companies, and I'm sure for some, it's "just a job", but I think most folks are proud of what they do. Now, if RIM can instill that level of pride and passion into their company and product development, they might have some hope of turning things around, but now they just seem desperate.</p>

    the big problem as I see it, is that everybody in waterloo (Not just RIM) makes excuses for them, thus they live in a bubble.

    first the Iphone sucks, then the apple hate the "were better than apple... lets copy them", then they release the storm, torch, (which were probably copies of apple prototype with a keyboard) and finally in a fit of hubris release the playbook... which even if it is just-good-enough at 200 dollars, was unfit-for-consumption-at-the-original-price-of-500.

    i still don't know why they released the playbook with build in studdering... when the Ipad was a model of fluid menus... (why-o-why could they not copy the fluidness of the iPad... had they done that then they might of had a shot) ... the answer is they did not do the work and instead allowed "FLASH" to do the work...

    the this hour has 23 minutes (a CBC news/satire/comedy show skit mocking RIM ala "hells kitchen" is what RIM really needed in RIM headquarters...

    if RIM would stop pandering to customers they don't have, and instead make products that the existing customers want, they may be able to prosper in a canadian sense.
  • Reply 63 of 107
    uguysrnutsuguysrnuts Posts: 459member


    Well what do you expect when you hire an ad agency whose sole claim to fame is to get people talking about your brand any way they can? They (the ad agency) never did promise the attention will be a positive one, or that they could mistake your ad for someone else.


     


    http://www.tongue.com.au/what-we-do


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post


    Wow.  Really, Research in Motion....REALLY?  You send people out with signs to "protest" at an Apple store and mock its customers?  For realz?  



     


     

  • Reply 64 of 107
    suddenly newtonsuddenly newton Posts: 13,819member


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


     


     


    And the moron who goes by the name of "Blunty" is the same moron who posted a three part review of the Blackberry Playbook. What a coincidence. Needless to say, it was a very positive and glowing review.


     




     


    Just like those 1-post wonders on the forums that register to post "I'm a long time apple user with a <apple-product> and I recently got a <competitor-product> and I have to honestly say I'm floored! The amazing <competitor-product-story> blew me away! Blah blah blah" never to be heard from again.


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    I thought that Samsung's recent commercials were pretty lame, but this RIM stunt just takes the cake. How utterly pathetic and totally desperate. Actually sending a mob to picket in front of a store? This is lower than low.



     


    I think it's a cry for help image

  • Reply 65 of 107
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,780member


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


     


     


    Ah, they're going to try to convince Australians that "going bankrupt, being quickly abandoned, and existing without purpose, drive, or vision" now 'means' "being in business".



     


    Irony upon irony eh? I bet RIM shareholders wish the management at RIM had woken up about five years ago! image

  • Reply 66 of 107
    ljocampoljocampo Posts: 657member


    Apple][ said:


     


    "I thought that Samsung's recent commercials were pretty lame, but this RIM stunt just takes the cake. How utterly pathetic and totally desperate. Actually sending a mob to picket in front of a store? This is lower than low."


     


     


    That's exactly my thoughts on Obama and his union cronies when they sent their minions to the "occupy wall street" mob.

  • Reply 67 of 107
    myapplelovemyapplelove Posts: 1,515member


     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post


     


     


    Irony upon irony eh? I bet RIM shareholders wish the management at RIM had woken up about five years ago! image



     


    Research in slow motion apparently.image


     


     


     


    ?

  • Reply 68 of 107
    evilutionevilution Posts: 1,399member


    Yes, I can see the advertising now.


     


    WAKE UP AND LOOK AT MY RIM.

  • Reply 69 of 107
    canuckleheadcanucklehead Posts: 393member


    Oh the irony of RIM using a "Wake Up" ad campaign!

  • Reply 70 of 107
    damn_its_hotdamn_its_hot Posts: 1,210member


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Joelhk View Post


    Isn't Samsung the world's number one phone maker now?



     


    Boy, you use the term "world's number one phone maker" very broadly -- that has implications that they provide the best phone out there. Possibly what you meant to say was that Samsung shipped the most phones -- wrong again, that would still be our friendly norskies Nokia I believe.


     


    I think a bit of research and rereading is required before you next post.


     


    ROTFL!

  • Reply 71 of 107
    damn_its_hotdamn_its_hot Posts: 1,210member


    I think they protesters missed the mark. They should have been doing this at RIM HQ -- if anyone has been caught asleep at the wheel its RIM.

  • Reply 72 of 107


    Relying on all the Media publications and attention to announce their best products released so far has not worked to have public take them seriously. This may be their last resort to save them from BB Bankruptcy.

  • Reply 73 of 107
    sockrolidsockrolid Posts: 2,789member


     


    To paraphrase Leon Kowalski (Brion James, "Blade Runner," 1982):


     


    "Wake up, RIM.  Time to die."


     

  • Reply 74 of 107
    dualiedualie Posts: 334member


    It was a marketing stunt and everyone on this board, and most tech media, fell for it. I'd say it worked as planned.

  • Reply 75 of 107
    galbigalbi Posts: 968member


    To those who said Samsung was lying. Eat your own words.

     

  • Reply 76 of 107
    galbigalbi Posts: 968member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Phone-UI-Guy View Post


    "Samsung Electronics Australia has nothing to do with the Wake-Up Campaign," the company said in a statement.


     


    However, Samsung Electronics South Korea does.... ;)



     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Gazoobee View Post


     


     


    Samsung is obviously lying though.  Other than Microsoft who else would it be but Samsung?  


     


    Microsoft usually owns up to this kind of stuff when they do it.  Ergo: It's Samsung and they are just lying.  



     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Xian Zhu Xuande View Post


    "Samsung Electronics Australia has nothing to do with..."


     


    I'm suspicious of that (and the specificity of that statement). This seems quite like their recent advertising campaign, but it takes some balls to come out and say you had nothing to do with it when there's a good chance it will be traced back to you if you did. Some kind of entity was behind this. Quite coordinated. Some money changed hands.



     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Santoanderson View Post



    Samsung: "It wasn't us. We swear!"

    Everbody else: "{COUGHS}Bullsh*t!{COUGHS}"


     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by FreeRange View Post


    What total bullshit! Samsung was absolutely behind it. And why is the ignorant press calling this a "flash mob". It WAS NOT A FLASH MOB. It was a publicity stunt with paid "actors" and has nothing to do with a flash mob so please quit showing your ignorance.



     


     


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by benanderson89 View Post


    I can't help but think Samsung is behind every second of this. I've seen the products in person standing side by side with the Apple counterparts and it has always been an exact duplicate in more than one area. Their latest laptop, that is identical to a matte screen macbook pro in every way (apart from having a numerical pad) is so obviously a copy its painful. I have products from loads of different vendors and I'm happy with all of them but I refuse to buy from Samsung. They are the only company I know of who's antics would not be out of place in a 90s action film - you know, the evil mega-corporation who's evil and has a CEO who laughs like a panto-villian! MUWAHAHAHA!


     


     


     


    Hot Dog is an American phrase coined at a baseball game :)



     


     


    lol




     


    I bet none of these folks would be posting on this thread. :D

  • Reply 77 of 107
    mavfan1mavfan1 Posts: 50member


    laughing at all the sheep who called Samsung liars after Samsung denied responsibility.   

  • Reply 78 of 107
    sglewissglewis Posts: 3member


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by dualie View Post


    It was a marketing stunt and everyone on this board, and most tech media, fell for it. I'd say it worked as planned.



     


    I'm not sure I follow that logic. It seems most people thought it was at best dumb and at worst insulting to potential customers. Everyone assumed it was Samsung, and nobody ended up talking about RIM. That cannot have been the plan, right?

  • Reply 79 of 107
    ronboronbo Posts: 669member


    Every now and then you see a dying man who decides to be an asshat right before the end. Kind of spoils the melancholy of his passing. But whatever.

  • Reply 80 of 107
    jragostajragosta Posts: 10,473member


     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mavfan1 View Post


    laughing at all the sheep who called Samsung liars after Samsung denied responsibility.   



     


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Galbi View Post


    To those who said Samsung was lying. Eat your own words.

     



     


    I wasn't one of them, but I'll say "so what?" 



    The fact is that it was lame attempt to get attention that didn't work. Maybe they should have spent the money having a fake funeral, instead. 



    Or waited a year or two and had a real one for RIM.

Sign In or Register to comment.