Apple's Ive on naming products: 'We're really quite careful with the words we use'
Apple design guru Jony Ive gave a bit of insight on how the iPhone maker sets to naming its products in a recent interview, claiming that the company's attention to detail goes down to the very words it chooses for its products.
Ive received an award from Children's BBC program Blue Peter last week, and in the process gave viewers a small tour of one of Apple's design and fabrication facilities. In an extra clip discovered by freelance journalist Tom Davenport, Ive discusses how Apple would hypothetically approach designing a lunchbox:
Ive received an award from Children's BBC program Blue Peter last week, and in the process gave viewers a small tour of one of Apple's design and fabrication facilities. In an extra clip discovered by freelance journalist Tom Davenport, Ive discusses how Apple would hypothetically approach designing a lunchbox:
Ive, as Apple's Senior Vice President of Industrial Design, led design efforts for the MacBook Pro, iMac, MacBook Air, iPod, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPad, and iPad mini."If we?re thinking of lunchbox, we?d be really careful about not having the word 'box' already give you ?bunch of ideas that could be quite narrow. You think of a box being a square, and like a cube. And so we?re quite careful with the words we use, because those can determine the path that you go down."
Comments
LOL at the box remark. Over here some use it to refer to a woman's, well, can't use the C word I presume.
Not sure what his comments have to do with the naming of products. Seems it's more about not having a name define the path you go down when designing a product.
And there's nothing square (all definitions) about it. Lol
deleted
That because it would have rounded corners.
Here's the full video segment from Blue Peter.
Love Ive's reaction as the kids are explaining their designs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordio
It's amazing how people stopped mocking the name "iPad". The first time the name was heard, everyone was making fun of it. Now it's a commonplace word.
yes...i remember...I was one of those people saying how bad a choice that name was. Now it is so normal i don't even think about it anymore.....
I guess that's why the 6th iPhone was 'iPhone 5'. They didn't want to get bogged down with names that made sense. It's definitely thinking outside the box; 6 is 5, after all, for sufficiently small values of 6…
Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton
"iLunch Pro" was mysteriously trademarked by Apple. It has patented cooling vents and an asymmetrical fan. And the lid opens with magnets to instantly present your food.
And mesh at the bottom, for crumbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
I guess that's why the 6th iPhone was 'iPhone 5'. They didn't want to get bogged down with names that made sense. It's definitely thinking outside the box; 6 is 5, after all, for sufficiently small values of 6…
And mesh at the bottom, for crumbs.
lol.....im going to let you have a pass on this.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekdad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
I guess that's why the 6th iPhone was 'iPhone 5'. They didn't want to get bogged down with names that made sense. It's definitely thinking outside the box; 6 is 5, after all, for sufficiently small values of 6…
And mesh at the bottom, for crumbs.
lol.....im going to let you have a pass on this.....
Admit it - you would have been disappointed if TS hadn't made some comment on this in relation to the iPhone naming debate.
Please Jony, less nonsense interviews, and more work on the next OSX release and on the new Mac Pro, please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton
That because it would have rounded corners.
and designed to feel really good in your hands
You can take a different pizza to lunch every day! And your beverage fits nicely in the accompanying iDrink.
By Tuesday, Samsung's salesmen will be selling knock-offs from their trench coats in alleyways. Be sure to check out their Nolex watches while you are there.
Originally Posted by muppetry
Admit it - you would have been disappointed if TS hadn't made some comment on this in relation to the iPhone naming debate.
Well, it was going to happen sooner or later; figured someone with a history of it should be the one.
I'm surprised he wasn't the first to post.