We are witnessing the biggest budget reality tv show ever produced. Nothing Trumps says really means anything, it is open for interpretation of the listener. I as many other believe Trump's goal is not be elected President but to show how many bigots this country really has hiding in the shadows. He's asking them to come out in force by pretending to be one of them. This might be the biggest con ever played out for the world to witness.
I had the realization the other day that the same group of people that made Beanie Babies a thing in the '90s are the same people that are making Trump a thing today. Once you get that visual, it's impossible to shake it.
Keep in mind he is very good friends with the Clintons.
No. He used to be friends with them. Trump was friendly with many politicians, as are all people who donate money.The Clintons obviously hate him now, especially after he went after them some weeks ago, where he called Bill one of the great abusers of the world.
They despise him now, and things will certainly get very ugly soon. I can't wait to see Trump going after Hillary soon and hitting her very badly. They are absolutely terrified to be going up against Trump.
You sir, are so eloquent, with your mature use of emoticons! You must be a Trump supporter. Trump supporters bring a refreshing intelligence wherever they show up. Me, I support terrorists, welfare recipients, bums, Mexicans, etc....
He is still 100% more honest than the woman called Hillary.
Only a Trump supporter could make such a statement.
Only a delusional liberal could make such a statement. Hilary has a laundry list of lies. Hell, she was lying during her last debate about the whole e-mail scandal.
He may be a clown, just a different sort of clown than politicians from the mainstream political parties. The radical stuff he says are, for the most part, things that could never be implemented anyway, just red meat for the angry and uneducated, which unfortunately is an ever increasing demographic in the US.
Tell me one "radical" thing he's said. Banning Muslim immigration temporarily? It's been done. Stopping illegal immigration and deporting those who broke into the country? It's done all over the world, and has been done here. Calling for tax reform and a strong military? Competition in healthcare? Seriously, name one thing he's called for that's radical.
He may be a clown, just a different sort of clown than politicians from the mainstream political parties. The radical stuff he says are, for the most part, things that could never be implemented anyway, just red meat for the angry and uneducated, which unfortunately is an ever increasing demographic in the US.
Tell me one "radical" thing he's said. Banning Muslim immigration temporarily? It's been done. Stopping illegal immigration and deporting those who broke into the country? It's done all over the world, and has been done here. Calling for tax reform and a strong military? Competition in healthcare? Seriously, name one thing he's called for that's radical.
Good luck getting someone to answer that question.
I truly believe that there will be a wall, not just a wall, but a huge wall, a big, beautiful wall, and construction will begin on it pretty quickly, after he's won.
The border is 2,000 miles long and 1900 of it is the middle of the Rio Grande. The US has treaties with Mexico regarding the river which would be in conflict with building a wall. Neither the US nor Mexico is going to willingly give up access to the river or lose territory so I don't know where you think this wall will be built.
I truly believe that there will be a wall, not just a wall, but a huge wall, a big, beautiful wall, and construction will begin on it pretty quickly, after he's won.
The border is 2,000 miles long and 1900 of it is the middle of the Rio Grande. The US has treaties with Mexico regarding the river which would be in conflict with building a wall. Neither the US nor Mexico is going to willingly give up access to the river or lose territory so I don't know where you think this wall will be built.
It will not be necessary to build the wall for the entire length of the border.
Whatever few complications there might be, I am confident that they will be resolved in a satisfactory manner.
The border is 2,000 miles long and 1900 of it is the middle of the Rio Grande.
And?
The US has treaties with Mexico regarding the river which would be in conflict with building a wall.
Not really. Build it on the US side.
Neither the US nor Mexico is going to willingly give up access to the river or lose territory so I don't know where you think this wall will be built.
Because the alternative is putting the border where it was legally supposed to be. Mexico probably won’t go for that until the cartels own the north entirely.
Tell me one "radical" thing he's said. Banning Muslim immigration temporarily? It's been done. Stopping illegal immigration and deporting those who broke into the country? It's done all over the world, and has been done here. Calling for tax reform and a strong military? Competition in healthcare? Seriously, name one thing he's called for that's radical.
He flip-flops on many issues so no one really knows what he is calling for, but I can tell you he would have a difficult time banning Muslims, killing terrorists' family members, taking away birth-right citizenship, getting rid of the EPA and defunding the Department of Education and Welfare. He said he would knock out Obama Care on day one. The President cannot simply repeal laws. Besides being bellicose and vulgar, he has no experience in governing and it shows. Don't get me wrong, I'm not for any candidate. They are all terrible.
I am not sure I have ever heard of a more two faced, bigoted, lying, politician in the history of US politics. There is no way this man even deserves a place anywhere near the White House. Maybe an out house because we all know what he is full of.
It will not be necessary to build the wall for the entire length of the border.
Whatever few complications there might be, I am confident that they will be resolved in a satisfactory manner.
The most often used method of illegally entering the US from Mexico is where the wall would need to be to have any effect and it just happens that they usually cross the river and make their way through the desert. So again how is the wall going to work unless it is the entire distance? To me it seems like there is nothing but complications.
The Mexican illegals are quite skillful at tunnel building as well. I would think a better strategy might be to use high technology to detect illegal entry attempts and to greatly increase the number of human border enforcement personnel.
Tell me one "radical" thing he's said. Banning Muslim immigration temporarily? It's been done. Stopping illegal immigration and deporting those who broke into the country? It's done all over the world, and has been done here. Calling for tax reform and a strong military? Competition in healthcare? Seriously, name one thing he's called for that's radical.
He flip-flops on many issues so no one really knows what he is calling for, but I can tell you he would have a difficult time banning Muslims, killing terrorists' family members, taking away birth-right citizenship, getting rid of the EPA and defunding the Department of Education and Welfare. He said he would knock out Obama Care on day one. The President cannot simply repeal laws. Besides being bellicose and vulgar, he has no experience in governing and it shows. Don't get me wrong, I'm not for any candidate. They are all terrible.
Now hold on..."having trouble getting X done" doesn't mean something is radical. Banning Muslims may or may not be the rihgt policy, but there is no question the President has the authority to do it. Killing terrorists' family members really depends on the exact circumstances, but unless he means straight-up murdering them, it's not "radical." Obamacare is a nightmare...many mainstream people have called for ending it. It's not working and is costing tens of billions and hurting employment. Why is ending it even close to radical? Repealing laws? Are you kidding? The GOP will hold Congress, and he will sign the bill they send on day one. You do realize that, correct? As for him being vulgar and bellicose, that has nothing to do with being "radical." Trump is far from a radical. In fact, he's the opposite. He's not an ideologue of any kind. You may not like him, but that doesn't make him "radical."
Idiotss, racists and uneducated ones are those voting for this hypocrite.
I'm neither of those and Trump is getting my vote.
Do vote for someone who has failed dozens of times at business, four of thes e being bankruptcies fleecing tens of millions from investors, someone who has put tens of thousands out of a job, has exported jobs to China and hired illegals despite being "against" that, says never settles lawsuits when in fact he's settled many dozens, lies about his net worth "it depends on his state of mind" (he tried to sue a guy with a book saying he was worth 100M and was rebuked), is an avowed mysoginist, xenophobe, narcissist and clear fascist tendencies, including doing proto-fascist salutes at his meetings!! He's defrauded students (still in court), real estate investors (settled), etc. He's vulgar, lacks vocabulary, is anti-science and anti-intellectuals of all types. He claims to be a wall street outsider when he's been wading with these guys from birth.
Finally, he always does the opposite of what he says, lies in 90% of what he says (say says all fact checking sites), can't recall half of what he says, He has virtually no knowledge of macro economy, foreign affairs, the constitution, and a whole list of other things. The guy has even been disavowed by the pope (of all people!).
Banning Muslims may or may not be the rihgt policy, but there is no question the President has the authority to do it. Killing terrorists' family members really depends on the exact circumstances, but unless he means straight-up murdering them, it's not "radical."
I'm not so sure he has the authority to ban Muslims. That would likely have to be tested in the Supreme Court as it is discrimination of religion. As far as straight up murdering family members, I think that is exactly what he was implying because he used the rationale that the family members knew what was going on and they didn't do anything or turn them in.
Interesting how the right wing Trump supporters are the same ones on Apple's side in the FBI (and Trump) versus Apple security debate.
Another example of their obvious ignorance.
I am 100% on Apple's side on the encryption issue. I am also 100% on Trump's side on the election issue.
There is no ignorance here, as I base my opinions and viewpoints on extensive research, vast amounts of knowledge, and an intelligent perspective that few group thinking liberal cult members could ever hope to possess.
As far as straight up murdering family members, I think that is exactly what he was implying because he used the rationale that the family members knew what was going on and they didn't do anything or turn them in.
I support that idea, it is a very good idea, and I have been saying the same thing for a long time, years before Trump ever came along and ran for president.
I truly believe that there will be a wall, not just a wall, but a huge wall, a big, beautiful wall, and construction will begin on it pretty quickly, after he's won.
We all know how ineffective that other great wall (the Berlin one) was for almost 30 years. You won't keep the people from getting over, under or through it if they are determined enough.
It will not be necessary to build the wall for the entire length of the border.
Whatever few complications there might be, I am confident that they will be resolved in a satisfactory manner.
The most often used method of illegally entering the US from Mexico is where the wall would need to be to have any effect and it just happens that they usually cross the river and make their way through the desert. So again how is the wall going to work unless it is the entire distance? To me it seems like there is nothing but complications.
The Mexican illegals are quite skillful at tunnel building as well. I would think a better strategy might be to use high technology to detect illegal entry attempts and to greatly increase the number of human border enforcement personnel.
Not only that, walls don't work as proven in a place were they're very good at building walls and going under them, Israel, Gaza and the territories.
The border there is fully militarized all around and short and the only place were the wall sort of works is in a short section that cost a huge amount to build (the wall is very high, has very deep foundations and is in concrete there), they still have to make sure no tunnels are built under it and post post soldiers for the whole length.
Doing the same thing with Mexico would be ridiculously expensive, probably 40-50 billions of dollars if done for the whole lenght with 5-10 billions more each year for the soldiers and it would still not stop the tunneling; but hey, defense contractors would be very very happy, that's what is important here...
Considering that the net influx right now is neutral, and that most mexicans in the US work in low paying jobs with no security that no Americans will take, who the hell knows what purpose the whole thing would have.
Remember that Trump also said he'd "round up" illegals... How he'd do that without transforming the whole south into a police state considering there are already laws that are flaunted to get those illegals working is left to out imagination of course.
Comments
Me, I support terrorists, welfare recipients, bums, Mexicans, etc....
Whatever few complications there might be, I am confident that they will be resolved in a satisfactory manner.
Not really. Build it on the US side.
Because the alternative is putting the border where it was legally supposed to be. Mexico probably won’t go for that until the cartels own the north entirely.
White House. Maybe an out house because we all know what he is full of.
The Mexican illegals are quite skillful at tunnel building as well. I would think a better strategy might be to use high technology to detect illegal entry attempts and to greatly increase the number of human border enforcement personnel.
As for him being vulgar and bellicose, that has nothing to do with being "radical." Trump is far from a radical. In fact, he's the opposite. He's not an ideologue of any kind. You may not like him, but that doesn't make him "radical."
Finally, he always does the opposite of what he says, lies in 90% of what he says (say says all fact checking sites), can't recall half of what he says,
He has virtually no knowledge of macro economy, foreign affairs, the constitution, and a whole list of other things.
The guy has even been disavowed by the pope (of all people!).
Yep, he's your fucking kind of guy all right.
There is no ignorance here, as I base my opinions and viewpoints on extensive research, vast amounts of knowledge, and an intelligent perspective that few group thinking liberal cult members could ever hope to possess.
You have to be able to see the big picture.
The border there is fully militarized all around and short and the only place were the wall sort of works is in a short section that cost a huge amount to build (the wall is very high, has very deep foundations and is in concrete there), they still have to make sure no tunnels are built under it and post post soldiers for the whole length.
Doing the same thing with Mexico would be ridiculously expensive, probably 40-50 billions of dollars if done for the whole lenght with 5-10 billions more each year for the soldiers and it would still not stop the tunneling; but hey, defense contractors would be very very happy, that's what is important here...
Considering that the net influx right now is neutral, and that most mexicans in the US work in low paying jobs with no security that no Americans will take, who the hell knows what purpose the whole thing would have.
Remember that Trump also said he'd "round up" illegals... How he'd do that without transforming the whole south into a police state considering there are already laws that are flaunted to get those illegals working is left to out imagination of course.