No, the ease of getting a divorce is directly proportional to the number of divorce lawyers that stand to make big bucks whenever they get a good settlement for the witch that guts the man's life savings.
haha. that too. But I think its an amazing insight into modern society that its legal for a lawyer to defend someone he knows is guilty.
haha. that too. But I think its an amazing insight into modern society that its legal for a lawyer to defend someone he knows is guilty.
This just shows how little you understand the system. Our system is far, far from perfect but the whole thing would break down if clients could not trust their lawyers.
Funny how the only reply he could muster to your incredibly poignant statement was a spelling correction and nothing else. Wait, it's not funny. It's sad.
Exactly, I laughed out loud at that one.
I actually just did again, reading Harald's post.
I wonder if Juke would have figured it out had you not commented on it. heh
That's what every smart man should put into his used condom before he tosses it in the trash. If the woman tries to take it out and impregnate herself, you'll know by the scream.
This just shows how little you understand the system. Our system is far, far from perfect but the whole thing would break down if clients could not trust their lawyers.
I never said we should eliminate it. I'm just pointing out what wonderful insight there is.
- This works, if you are *very* accurate in your temperatur measurements, and abstain from fvcking 6 days before ovulation to maybe 4 days after. To reach 1%, you have an infertility window between the 18th and 24th day - thats 6 days out of 31.
If you are less strict, the method has a failure rate of about 15% (the pill is less than 1%, condoms around 5%) AND you can contract *any* STD. Great choice indeed.
Somehow I doubt that condom manufacturers include the users who got pregnant due to user error in their statistic. As for the 20 sexually active years, perhaps you have a medical problem.
Sorry to disappoint you, i went to a fertillity test (exactly because a former gf wanted to get off the pill), and my fertillity is slightly above average (switched to condoms and she never became pregnant )
Besides - I expressly stated that I never broke or lost a condom. AFAIK there is no medical condition known that would account for that (leave my dicksize out of it, it's just fine )
I just proved the invalidity of that assumption using the back of the condom package, the link someone provided above, and 8th grade math. If you can't see that then its really just a matter of invincible ignorance on your part.
Actually, you didn't address what I said in the least.
2) Condoms don't have tiny ****ing holes in them that let sperm through.
3) The Church has taken a FAITH-based point of view, not a scientific one, and it happens to be totally ****ing wrong. People will DIE in fact, if they follow the 'thinking'.
4) The only sort of person who would attempt a DEFENCE of this (as we say outside of the US, you small-minded parochial ****stick) is someone so incapable of the correct use of prophylactics he gets seminal fluid all over his curlies when he uses a condom and conflates vaginal lubrication with sperm.
I think you have to laugh that there can be so many completely opposite opinions. It seems obvious to me and the opposite seems obvious to you. I think the bitterness that people are showing in this thread are the result of frustrations with the world. I think maybe I could never say it better than that song from Mike and the Mechanics.
Every generation blames the one before when all of their frustrations come beating on your door. I know that I'm a prisoner to all my Father held so dear. I know that I'm a hostage to all his hopes and fears
...
Crumpled bits of paper, filled with imperfect thought;
Stilted conversations, I'm afraid that's all we've got.
You say you just don't see it. He says it's perfect sense. You just can't get agreement in this present tense. We all talk a different language, talking in defense.
...
So we open up a quarrel, between the present and the past.
We only sacrifice the future, it's the bitterness that lasts.
...
I'm sure I heard his echo in my baby's new born tears.
...
What a great song. But its the bitterness that lasts... Look anywhere in the world... Its not God, or religion, or government, or anybody to blame besides the bitterness that makes us say and do stupid things. I understand that people have lost faith in God. I think, again, is the consequence of man, not God. For another thing, obeying God is going to be difficult sometimes. Don't use that as an excuse to write him off. And don't read the angry words of bitterness and assume that your seeing the true voice of the Catholic Church. If you want to know the stance they really take on an issue, find out from the official doctrines of the church.
Failure rates are always given on a yearly base (no per individual screw). So your bogus calculation from two pages up gets even more bogus.
Usually, couples have a lot of sex over the course of one year, so the likelyhood of exchanging bodily fluids (involuntarily of course - at times women juice can be quite a great thing ) is something like 5% / screwsperyear - for a non-moronic couple thats in the promille range.
3) The Church has taken a FAITH-based point of view, not a scientific one, and it happens to be totally ****ing wrong. People will DIE in fact, if they follow the 'thinking'.
What position do you expect the church to take? Besides, if you hate Catholics so much, you should be happy that we're all going to die of AIDS.
Comments
Originally posted by BR
No, the ease of getting a divorce is directly proportional to the number of divorce lawyers that stand to make big bucks whenever they get a good settlement for the witch that guts the man's life savings.
haha. that too. But I think its an amazing insight into modern society that its legal for a lawyer to defend someone he knows is guilty.
Originally posted by BR
Clairvoyant.
Pepper sauce
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
haha. that too. But I think its an amazing insight into modern society that its legal for a lawyer to defend someone he knows is guilty.
This just shows how little you understand the system. Our system is far, far from perfect but the whole thing would break down if clients could not trust their lawyers.
Originally posted by BR
Funny how the only reply he could muster to your incredibly poignant statement was a spelling correction and nothing else. Wait, it's not funny. It's sad.
Exactly, I laughed out loud at that one.
I actually just did again, reading Harald's post.
I wonder if Juke would have figured it out had you not commented on it. heh
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
Pepper sauce
That's what every smart man should put into his used condom before he tosses it in the trash. If the woman tries to take it out and impregnate herself, you'll know by the scream.
Originally posted by murbot
Exactly, I laughed out loud at that one.
I actually just did again, reading Harald's post.
I wonder if Juke would have figured it out had you not commented on it. heh
I'm sure if jesus wanted him to figure it out he would.
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
haha. that too. But I think its an amazing insight into modern society that its legal for a lawyer to defend someone he knows is guilty.
Oh c'mon everyone. This has to be trolling right?
I LOVE this thread.
Originally posted by BR
This just shows how little you understand the system. Our system is far, far from perfect but the whole thing would break down if clients could not trust their lawyers.
I never said we should eliminate it. I'm just pointing out what wonderful insight there is.
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
I never said we should eliminate it. I'm just pointing out what wonderful insight there is.
No, it's not a wonderful insight. It's something that everyone already knows. It's fundamental to the system.
Originally posted by keyboardf12
For god sakes. Just don't ask him about the fossil record!
I've got fossils in my pubes. God put them there to test me.
[B]
Nothing new or revolutionary here. Heres a link,
http://www.ccli.org/nfp/effect2.shtml
Nice, only:
- This works, if you are *very* accurate in your temperatur measurements, and abstain from fvcking 6 days before ovulation to maybe 4 days after. To reach 1%, you have an infertility window between the 18th and 24th day - thats 6 days out of 31.
If you are less strict, the method has a failure rate of about 15% (the pill is less than 1%, condoms around 5%) AND you can contract *any* STD. Great choice indeed.
Link 1
Link 2
Somehow I doubt that condom manufacturers include the users who got pregnant due to user error in their statistic. As for the 20 sexually active years, perhaps you have a medical problem.
Sorry to disappoint you, i went to a fertillity test (exactly because a former gf wanted to get off the pill), and my fertillity is slightly above average (switched to condoms and she never became pregnant
Besides - I expressly stated that I never broke or lost a condom. AFAIK there is no medical condition known that would account for that (leave my dicksize out of it, it's just fine
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
I just proved the invalidity of that assumption using the back of the condom package, the link someone provided above, and 8th grade math. If you can't see that then its really just a matter of invincible ignorance on your part.
Actually, you didn't address what I said in the least.
1) Condoms reduce AIDS. Significantly.
2) Condoms don't have tiny ****ing holes in them that let sperm through.
3) The Church has taken a FAITH-based point of view, not a scientific one, and it happens to be totally ****ing wrong. People will DIE in fact, if they follow the 'thinking'.
4) The only sort of person who would attempt a DEFENCE of this (as we say outside of the US, you small-minded parochial ****stick) is someone so incapable of the correct use of prophylactics he gets seminal fluid all over his curlies when he uses a condom and conflates vaginal lubrication with sperm.
The End.
Well said.
Every generation blames the one before when all of their frustrations come beating on your door. I know that I'm a prisoner to all my Father held so dear. I know that I'm a hostage to all his hopes and fears
...
Crumpled bits of paper, filled with imperfect thought;
Stilted conversations, I'm afraid that's all we've got.
You say you just don't see it. He says it's perfect sense. You just can't get agreement in this present tense. We all talk a different language, talking in defense.
...
So we open up a quarrel, between the present and the past.
We only sacrifice the future, it's the bitterness that lasts.
...
I'm sure I heard his echo in my baby's new born tears.
...
What a great song. But its the bitterness that lasts... Look anywhere in the world... Its not God, or religion, or government, or anybody to blame besides the bitterness that makes us say and do stupid things. I understand that people have lost faith in God. I think, again, is the consequence of man, not God. For another thing, obeying God is going to be difficult sometimes. Don't use that as an excuse to write him off. And don't read the angry words of bitterness and assume that your seeing the true voice of the Catholic Church. If you want to know the stance they really take on an issue, find out from the official doctrines of the church.
Failure rates are always given on a yearly base (no per individual screw). So your bogus calculation from two pages up gets even more bogus.
Usually, couples have a lot of sex over the course of one year, so the likelyhood of exchanging bodily fluids (involuntarily of course - at times women juice can be quite a great thing
Originally posted by Jukebox Hero
If you want to know the stance they really take on an issue, find out from the official doctrines of the church.
As I am trying to live a life free of indoctrination - thanks, but no thanks, the martyr pose you are strinking does not move my heart
Originally posted by Harald
ohforfuxake
3) The Church has taken a FAITH-based point of view, not a scientific one, and it happens to be totally ****ing wrong. People will DIE in fact, if they follow the 'thinking'.
What position do you expect the church to take? Besides, if you hate Catholics so much, you should be happy that we're all going to die of AIDS.
Originally posted by Smircle
Ah BTW Jukebox, there is another little thing...
Failure rates are always given on a yearly base (no per individual screw). So your bogus calculation from two pages up gets even more bogus.
No, nothing bogus. They still don't account for the fact that a woman is not fertile but a small percentage of the time.