ABC News teases report of 'historic' Apple announcement

16781012

Comments

  • Reply 181 of 237
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post



    3) I'd love for the 'i' names to end.

    I think calling it "iWear" would emphasize the wearable nature (obviously) but also be a nice little jab at Google Glass.

  • Reply 182 of 237
    Originally Posted by AaronJ View Post

    Is there not going to be an Apple TV channel for the event this year?  I checked just a little while ago


     

    They’re gonna keep you guys on edge. It’ll only appear if you turn your Apple TV on within five minutes of the keynote start.

  • Reply 183 of 237
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

     

     

    They’re gonna keep you guys on edge. It’ll only appear if you turn your Apple TV on within five minutes of the keynote start.


     

    Meanies! :)

  • Reply 184 of 237
    It would really be funny if Apple announced a car. The iCar. There it is!
  • Reply 185 of 237

    If it will be called iWatch, then it is not a watch.

     

    Perhaps a electronic wallet, one that you only need to shake yr hand for it to work/interacts with your surroundings.

  • Reply 186 of 237

    That voice over is horrible.

  • Reply 187 of 237
    freediverx wrote: »
    What "PR"? Absolutely everything Apple has said is: "Wish we could say more." They can't be blamed for ABC's hyperbole.


    It's clear Apple's PR machine is working up a media frenzy behind the scenes. And there's nothing wrong with that... so long as they've got something to show that lives up to expectations. 

    Clear as mud, Mr. Speculator.
  • Reply 188 of 237
    solipsismx wrote: »
    BREAKING: Apple is going to close it's doors and give the money back to its shareholders.

    Dell-icious.
  • Reply 189 of 237
    thompr wrote: »
     

    “Historic” pits it against the introduction of the Macintosh, iMac, and iPhone.

    And there is absolutely no way it could so much as match any of them.

    Just like, according to you, there was absolutely no way they would call the iPhone released in 2012 the "iPhone 5"?  I think you speak too often in absolutes.

    Eddy Cue seems to think that they can top the initial iPhone announcement.  I have my doubts about that too, but since he knows whatever it is he's talking about, and I don't, I'll have to be less absolutely certain than you are.

    You don't have to be, but you choose to be.
  • Reply 190 of 237
    apple ][ wrote: »
    Only about 11.5 hours to go!

    Tomorrow will be more interesting than the World Series, the Superbowl and the Soccer World cup combined! What's world changing about any of those boring events? Absolutely nothing.

    For as far back as I can recall, I don't believe that there's ever been an Apple event that has been more hyped and highly anticipated than this year's event.

    Bring it on!

    Well said! I hope Apple manage to bring a smile to Steve Jobs's ghostly face today.
  • Reply 191 of 237
    <span style="line-height:1.4em;">Most of us just didn't know they would all be in one device.  Awesome.</span>

    <img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="48321" data-type="61" src="http://forums.appleinsider.com/content/type/61/id/48321/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL" style="; width: 480px; height: 310px">


    THAT’S IT!

    The iPhone 6 is a 4K HDTV, watch, redesigned Mac Mini, Haswell Mac Pro, 12.3” iPad, and simultaneously comes in two sizes, using quantum principles to collapse itself into either 4.7” or 5.5” depending on observation!

    ????
  • Reply 192 of 237
    mode 5 wrote: »
    Steve Jobs' RDF has morphed into the parappledox, the less they say the more berserk the buildup gets. Something that is different from the last new "category" intro, if that's what's happening tomorrow, is Apples audience has grown massively over recent years. The level of interest around the planet in where Apple moves the tech compass next, is, at the very least, "socially" historic regardless of what they actually announce.   

    parappledox - love it!

    You could say that Apple has become a dappleganger! ????
  • Reply 193 of 237
    Considering that Disney owns ABC, ESPN, etc. and that Mrs. Jobs is the single largest, non-institutional investor in Disney stalk via the Pixar purchase by Disney - in the name of journalistic disclosure, who's really surprised about their "exclusive."
  • Reply 194 of 237
    dacloo wrote: »
    I would laugh so hard if Apple would just announce a 'speed bump' for the Mac Mini and then leave the stage.

    ????
  • Reply 195 of 237
    ascii wrote: »
    The word "historic" sounds like hyperbole to me. I can't imagine a tech company (even Apple) announcing anything of historic scale importance. Medical companies could, e.g. cure for cancer. But computer companies? A quantum computer maybe. Or the first AI. But neither of those are going to happen, it will just be a wearable computer.

    Maybe in a few years we will all be wearing computers, and look back on this as the start, and that's what they mean by this being an historic announcement.

    You mean a historic announcement.
  • Reply 196 of 237
    solipsismx wrote: »
    ascii wrote: »
    Notable in the history of computers or the history of man?

    p.s. ??? = iWear

    1) Both.

    2) You clearly don't think it's the latter but Apple didn't qualify their statement, you made an assumption.

    3) I'd love for the 'i' names to end.

    Maybe they'll start using 'u' instead. Hence the U2 rumours. Makes sense, don't uThink?
  • Reply 197 of 237
    The hype is now out of control. Calling today's event a historic announcement the only way the stinking media can adds lots of pressure for Apple to deliver something big. They better not disappoint. Looking forward to the event. If Apple gets to do what Steve Jobs did with the first iPhone or even iPad it will indeed be amazing. I sure hope so.
  • Reply 198 of 237
    dasanman69 wrote: »
    Need a uterus to be hysterical. ????
    Um... no. Not what is meant or implied in modern usage, despite the etymology.
  • Reply 199 of 237

    Very bold to use the word "Historic" with a product launch. If this ends up being a pretty watch and nothing more - the the word "historic" and its use by ABC stands to help Youtuber's mock Apple some more with their banned commercials (which are funny)  The Apple TV in the from Steve Jobs eluded to in his book could very well be historic.

     

    I just have a problem of using significant words to describe otherwise late to the party devices.  I had mentioned this in a previous post, but introducing phones with bigger screens that their competitors have had around for a while is not historic and a watch....... please....  who has a watch anymore?  Unless this watch happens to be mind blowing.  Which I highly doubt.    That TV though - that'd be a game changer.  In the end - who cares,  the events are always fun and I enjoy them immensely.

  • Reply 200 of 237
    Originally Posted by Chemicle View Post

    The Apple TV in the from Steve Jobs eluded to in his book could very well be historic.



    If you’re thinking that means a television, you’re wrong.

Sign In or Register to comment.