crowley

AppleInsider said:

"it's high time Apple changed something - anything - about the iPad Pro's design, because three generations of virtually no changes is too much," he writes, before offering the iPad's front camera position change could be an idea for next time.

Fuck off fashionista.

AppleInsider said:

Your monitor is having an identity crisis; it seems to think it's a MacBook Pro with a notch.

Maybe he ran out of dumb tricks.  I'd be surprised if he didn't try more shenanigans.

soundsinmotion said:

What happens in 10 years when usbc is old technology?

Why do you think that technology can change but regulation can't?

bala1234 said:

Nobody in Apple (or any other company involved in advertising) made a decision decided to show gambling ads next to addiction recovery or children's apps .  

They made the decision to allow gambling app advertising, and then did not monitor it very closely.

Advertising of gambling has specific regulation in many jurisdictions, so it’s highly improbable that gambling app advertising has not been specifically discussed.  They have massively failed to negotiate this territory if this is the result.

appleinsideruser said:

crowley said:

AppleInsider said:

This first public release version of Stage Manager for iPadOS gives users the ability to place up to four windows on an iPad screen at one time.

It's been a while since I was in school, but counting hasn't changed so much that four now means six, surely?

Given you’re normally very rude, try reading the article again brainbox! 

Pay particular attention to: “Users can make Stage Manager into a complex windowing mess with PiP and Quick Note” 

And that makes six windows!

Tell me why this isn't ridiculous:

gtr said:

1). The guy has basically financed his own nomination campaign and owes no favours.

If you buy into the "self-financed" con of Trump filling his own pockets with his supporters' donations then you'll believe anything.

digitalclips said:

crowley said:

SpamSandwich said:

"...while others have simply had to bear the expense."

That's not how businesses work. What are the supporting examples for this?

Businesses work in whatever way it takes to sell things to people.  Raising prices when you don't have to is generally not an effective way to do that.

Evidence?  The retail struggles to keep prices the same are playing out in public: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37639518

No one raised the price, the price was altered by exchange rates.  When I cash a £ check at Wells Fargo and I get 22% less should I ask them why they lowered the amount of $s I get?  No, I have a brain and know the exchange rate went down.  Whining at the lady in the bank would be stupidity.  In fact I see her often and she kindly winced and said 'Ouch' as she isn't stupid either.

Don't be obtuse.  The price of the Mac Pro was £2,499 last week, and £2,999 this week.  That's a price rise.  The exchange rate has not changed significantly since last week, so Apple have consciously decided that this was the time to raise prices.  

Exchanging currency directly is a totally different kettle of fish.  Apple's prices in the UK are not listed in $.

voidcomplex said:

When will people understand that Equality means Equal Opportunity NOT Equal Representation! 

No it doesn't, you've made that up.  Equality is a word that can be used differently in different contexts and mean different things to different people.