rob53
About
- Username
- rob53
- Joined
- Visits
- 273
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 9,125
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,383
Reactions
-
Apple not interested in takeover of Arm Holdings, report claims [u]
Here's some information on the Arm instruction set (ISA) and general Arm information.
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets I imagine Apple is using the A64 ISA.
---An Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) is part of the abstract model of a computer. It defines how software controls the CPU.The Arm ISA family allows developers to write software and firmware that conforms to the Arm specifications, secure in the knowledge that any Arm-based processor will execute it in the same way. This is the foundation of the Arm portability and compatibility promise, underlying the Arm ecosystem.
---
wikipedia: Arm (previously officially written all caps as ARM and usually written as such today), previously Advanced RISC Machine, originally Acorn RISC Machine, is a family of reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architectures for computer processors, configured for various environments. Arm Holdings develops the architecture and licenses it to other companies, who design their own products that implement one of those architectures—including systems-on-chips (SoC) and systems-on-modules (SoM) that incorporate memory, interfaces, radios, etc. It also designs cores that implement this instruction set and licenses these designs to a number of companies that incorporate those core designs into their own products.
@ericthehalfbee Had a very good analogy using a car engine. -
TSMC 3nm 'risk production' in 2021 paves the way to 2022 mass production
A picometer would be the next smaller processor fabrication but even at the high numbers we're talking about the width of mineral cells. There has to be a limit on how small you can go before the size of the components won't work anymore. Once this limit is reached, how will processor fabrication change to improve speed and reduced power usage? This is like the limits of processor speed. We've already reached those limits even with overclocking that can't be sustained. -
Amnesty International loses case against iPhone spyware firm NSO
GeorgeBMac said:rob53 said:Before anyone tries to say anything I'm saying is anti-semitism, please understand that I have nothing against all the people of Jewish faith around the world. I do, however, have lots to say about all the criminal activity by technology firms based in Israel and Israel in general. Israeli firms have been targeting US government installations for years and we do little to stop them. Boasting that they create malware tools for governments and law enforcement agencies is not a good sales pitch for consumers and citizens in general. Shut them all down.I agree.Condemning criminal actions is not anti- anything -- except anti-bad-behavior.To put this into perspective: If China did what Israel and the NSO have been doing right wing heads would be exploding across the U.S.The hypocrisy is akin a to being pro-life while supporting capital punishment. -
Apple silicon Macs to support Thunderbolt despite shift to ARM
That statement doesn't show everything Apple said, only some excerpts. It would have been better for The Verge to publish the actual statement so we know exactly what Apple said. This is the difference between USB and Thunderbolt, something many people who only see numbers refuse to acknowledge:
Both Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4 offer higher hardware requirements compared to the standard USB 3 and USB4 standards that they’re built off of, and offer a consistency that regular USB-C standards can often be sorely lacking in.
Thunderbolt 4, in particular, offers the same 40 Gbps speeds that Thunderbolt 3 had offered, but adds even stricter hardware requirements: devices will have to be able to support either two 4K displays or one 8K display, and allow for PCIe data transfer speeds of up to 32 Gbps.
-
Intel details Thunderbolt 4 spec, but 'Apple silicon' support is unclear [u]
aderutter said:OutdoorAppDeveloper said:As a standard, Thunderbolt in all its iterations is an abject failure for two reasons: No affordable devices supported it and the selection was extremely limited. Thunderbolt was only found on external SSD drives that cost about twice as much as the USB 3 versions and often offered little additional performance. USB on the other hand has been a staggering success. When people purchase a new computer, the first thing they often look for is how many USB C 3.2 ports they offer. It works with everything (including Thunderbolt) and is frequently updated with additional speed/features. The only thing you have to watch out for are shady cables on Amazon (pay a bit extra and buy from a reputable brand). If you really want Thunderbolt, buy an add in card for your Mac Pro.
I agree most people don’t need this performance and that for low-end users USB3.n is usually adequate.
I think the best thing about this TB4 looks to be the 4-port dock possibility.