danox
About
- Username
- danox
- Joined
- Visits
- 150
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 5,357
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,910
Reactions
-
White House: Apple set to announce a major investment
sconosciuto said:Flatter the fascist cult leader and things will go well for you 🙄
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/02/nx-s1-5489704/praise-trump-flattery -
iPhone 17 import tariffs may cost Apple more than expected, as Trump threatens India
-
Tim Cook: We spent on AI companies in the quarter, but nobody big
blastdoor said:One exciting possibility for Apple is that by using their own silicon, they could potentially have lower inference costs than people relying on Nvidia. Combine that with their privacy / security and they could make a compelling case for their AI offering.
hopefully they will realize that potential. -
Apple didn't need AI -- but it did need China -- to beat analysts' doom and gloom
WillfulJonsin said:Danox, is there literally something wrong with you? Your posts exists in this weird off-topic parallel universe where you seem to be parasite-style hosting your own disconnected, rambling blog via the comment section of AppleInsider. Your links often don't illustrate the points you think they do and you seem to be continually waging a holy war against some perceived insult against a trillion dollar corporation. What's your end game here? I've lurked on AI for years before making an account and maybe I'm burning whatever goodwill I have by posting this but swear to god you make zero sense.
https://www.webpronews.com/dan-ives-slams-apples-ai-lag-urges-perplexity-buy-for-4t-future/ Crying about AI is basically the same.
The links also show that there are a lot of analyst who are full of something, and the same meme is playing out when it comes to AI, Apple will take whatever time it needs to develop their Apple Intelligence system. Don’t like it switch to Android, or Microsoft Windows both have a larger marketshare and are ahead in being attached to super computers back home when you need a fix. -
Apple didn't need AI -- but it did need China -- to beat analysts' doom and gloom
blastdoor said:Mike Wuerthele said:blastdoor said:Mike Wuerthele said:blastdoor said:This earnings report in NO WAY proves that people worried about Apple's ability to capitalize on AI are wrong.
The concerns about AI are not about earnings next quarter or even next year. It's about 18 months and further out.
One thing I'm very confident of -- Apple leadership is not as myopic as the fanboy base. They've known for a while now that they've got a problem, they just haven't solved it yet. One way or another, I'm pretty confident the problem will be solved. But it won't be solved by pretending it doesn't exist.
Apple will do what it very nearly always does, which is what the analysts in question always, always fail to see -- Iterate until they have something that they like. No visibility as to what Apple is doing does not mean that Apple is not working on it.At this point in the AI lack of maturity, not having a product that really utilizes generative AI is not really an issue. If Apple doesn't do anything in a year or two, then maybe it's an issue.Turns out, that's not what happened.Very easy all of the same doom and gloom noise about Apple.
- Sales down doomed in China again for the last dozen years.
- Apple behind in AI their competitors are ahead whatever that means (behind even those companies who have no OS and no hardware).
- Designing that Apple modem is a waste of time.
- Why can’t Apple be like HP and Dell and just design hardware?
- Tim Cook sucks….
- Apple should buy a movie studio Paramount?, or a AI company Perplexity?, or some other AI company for billions of dollars doesn’t matter who.
- The Verge writes its normal Geek Chic Apple is perpetually doomed unless they do what the Verge thinks is right since 2008.
-
Note: If you are a shareholder long Apple, you are used to discounting the noise, however if you were a casual retail investor, you are bombarded and confused and the same applies to many other people on some of the non Apple Tech sites.
No wonder Apple stock goes through the same repeating pattern of stalling before earnings reports and after and then slowly crawls up over-time a wash rinse and repeat pattern.
https://www.siliconvalley.com/2025/05/19/how-apple-fell-behind-in-the-ai-race/
https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-earnings-under-pressure-tariffs-slow-ai-roll-out-2025-07-30/
https://www.ainvest.com/news/apple-ai-struggles-tech-giant-struggling-pace-ai-race-2504/
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4788607-apple-risks-from-every-direction-plague-this-legacy-giant
https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-tariff-uncertainty-china-iphone-exemption-trump-2025-4?op=1
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apples-150-billion-meltdown-tariffs-184825581.html
https://fortune.com/2025/07/16/apple-tim-cook-leadership-shakeup-ai-analyst-note/
https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/05/07/sorry-but-tariffs-least-of-apple-stock-problems/
The number of sites are legion…..