Beats
About
- Banned
- Username
- Beats
- Joined
- Visits
- 60
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,902
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,073
Reactions
-
Apple's iPhone 13 selling better than past lineups -- with one exception
-
Apple expands feature that blurs iMessage nudity to UK, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia...
crowley said:Paul_B said:slow n easy said:Paul_B said:Apple should work on MacOS's speed, and iCould's interface mimic that of the MacOS - yet they are working on kiddy porn.
My point was it's a waste of time, they work can on nuclear technology for all I care, but don't waste engineers time.It’s none of their business. Let the lazy trigger-happy government agencies/cops do their damn job!! -
Meta to charge content creators almost 50% to sell VR content
-
Arizona is first state to launch drivers' license in Apple Wallet
gavinthain said:Out come the Tin Hats.
we weren’t afraid of the McDonald’s employee when Apple Pay released. -
Five Galaxy S22 Ultra features which should be on the iPhone
patchythepirate said:payeco said:This article was written like was meant to fill a quota.
I think I'd prefer the hole punch, but I don't care that much either way.
I definitely want an under the screen fingerprint reader. It's so much easier than positioning your head and eyes (yes, I know the eye thing can be changed in settings), and that's even before dealing with annoying issues like glasses, masks, etc. It's so much easier to confirm apple pay without having to look at or position your phone, I miss that. In addition, it'd be cool to be able to program certain fingers for different tasks, eg authenticating, popping up a menu (like a right click type thing), open a specific app, triggering a home kit scene, etc.I don’t get the whole argument against FaceID being inferior because you have to look at your iPhone to activate it.
Ummm… don’t you have to look at your iPhone to use it anyway? Or are some of you using your iPhone blindly?