longfang

About

Username
longfang
Joined
Visits
145
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,126
Badges
1
Posts
555
  • New Vietnam trade deal means Apple will pay at least five times more in tariffs

    Kuminga said:
    Kuminga said:
    0 percent for US companies into Vietnam is incredible

    The fact Vietnam is wiling to agree to this show the ominous power of America 
    It shows that the demand for US imports is so negligible that it doesn't matter.
    No, these countries all had trade barriers on US goods

    Did you know that Australia does not allow US beef because they say it’s poisonous due to poor US ranchers techniques ? Are you dead from eating UA beef? I am not.

    Europe did same to American chickens .

    That is why US export numbers so low and what Trump trying to fix 
    From personal experience, US chicken smells funny. 
    spheric9secondkox2sconosciuto
  • New Vietnam trade deal means Apple will pay at least five times more in tariffs

    capnbob said:
    I assume this only applies to those devices in the list sold in the US not those bought in the rest of the world. Given that the US is about 40% of Apple revenue (mostly iPhones and Mac’s), the impact of this on Apple will be meaningful but surely not very significant?
    The impact on US consumers will be precisely what they voted for?
    There has been discussion that Apple will dilute the impact to the US consumer by raising prices worldwide. So, I guess the answer to your question is "it remains to be seen."
    They can try. The consumer doesn’t have to go along with it. 
    9secondkox2williamlondon
  • Apple plans low-cost MacBook based on iPhone processor

    Incredibly stupid idea. 

    Apple already has the MacBook Air. 

    Now they want to make an iPad with a keyboard but no touchscreen?

    the iPhone SOC is for the phone. 

    Don’t weaken the Mac just to have an even cheaper model. 

    Sounds really bad. 
    Why not? I’d love an updated sub 900g notebook for travel. As I age I just couldn’t be arsed to lug so much around unto aircraft. 
    chia9secondkox2russwright_said_fredwilliamlondonTRAGwatto_cobra
  • Courts say AI training on copyrighted material is legal

    mfryd said:
    Meh. Seems emotional and sentimental. If you are placing your content on the web, you are practically posting it on the street for general view with absurd hopes of pennies trickling in on some desperate fancy rather than through proper business channels with an effective strategy of legally protecting and promoting yourself - childish. Most people who do such art that they may avoid other types of structured paid work - what do they expect when they treat their skill set as a hobby - likely not wanting to work for others on a structured gig - if that's even around much? What's even the issue here - not getting a piece of the trifling leavings of scrapers and edu-content pedlars? pedantic. Art needs to stop being a vague creation-vocation of the rando people and grow up. Successful society is based on complex businesses and legal structures requiring serious people acting seriously. Creativity is a real skill and needs focused training and  a hierarchy of knowledgeable people to propagate it through society. Sorry, but I have little symp for the dilettantes and dabblers hoping to otherwise avoid the soulless cubicle, construction site, and assembly line.
    It's not that simple.  The AI companies are scraping material that isn't on the web.  They are scanning and scraping printed books.  They are scraping copyrighted movies.   

    They are scraping the copyrighted works of artists who earn their living licensing their work.
    Would it be okay then if the scrapping were done via the AI’s “eyes” aka camera reading a physical book?
    thtwilliamlondon
  • Lighter than normal WWDC expected without significant Apple Intelligence upgrades

    charlesn said:
    blastdoor said:
    I have now fully come around to agreeing that It’s time for Tim Cook to go. 

    A lot of great things happened under his leadership, especially apple silicon in Macs, but the Apple car debacle and now the AI debacle are convincing me that Apple needs a “product guy” leading the firm again. 
    Please explain what you see as a "debacle" for the R&D that Apple put into a possible car. There was never any assurance that a car would result from this effort--the whole point of doing research and development is to determine if manufacturing a competitive and superior product is possible and financially viable. And for Apple, never having been in the car manufacturing business, the challenge was even more difficult, especially considering that Apple's business model is based on very high profit margins, while autos are a fraction of that. At the end of the day, Apple decided there was no financially viable path forward and shut down the project. Look around at the EV business and you'll understand why this was the smartest decision: Fiskar is already out of business, Rivian and Polestar continue hemorrhaging money like it's water, and every company not named Tesla that produces EVs is losing a massive amount of money on every EV they sell. Ford has been manufacturing cars for 123 years, yet Car & Driver reported that in the Q1 2024, it was losing $130,000 on every EV that it sold. And now, with the EV business already a black hole money pit for car makers, Trump is ending the incentives that helped to bolster EV sales, so things are about to get even worse.

    The inescapable truth from all available evidence is that Apple avoided a money-losing debacle by shutting down Project Titan. 
    The only argument one might make--and there's no way to know the truth of it--is that they should have shut it down sooner than they did. We also don't know what R&D for Project Titan might be useful for breakthroughs on other projects, so it's not as if the whole thing was pointless. 
    If by every car manufacturer you mean every American car manufacturer then sure. They do exist outside the US too.
    9secondkox2