Wwdc

18911131439

Comments

  • Reply 201 of 770
    screedscreed Posts: 1,077member
    (Not FH but definitely WWDC):



    The Naked Mole Rat reports that Apple has turned a cadre of their developers into Elite Project Builder Evangelistas to convert the masses to 64-bit-ness. Many of those TBA slots will be allocated to PB64.



    (Lord, listen to me... I sound like Herr Rat)



    No mention of hardware, but... then what would they develop/test on, hmm??







    Screed
  • Reply 202 of 770
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    So do we think we'll see a leaked photo the week before WWDC? EVERYONE save it to your hard drive because if I miss it I'll be pissed. Ya know... one of those deals where it's up for a couple of hours... there's a huge buzz then Apple gets it pulled. Then I hit the boards and I'm like... what PHOTO?!



    Apple did a good job of keeping the LCD iMac under wraps... I don't remember any leaked images other than the Time Magazine screw up.



    But if there's a sealed pallet of shiny new 970's sitting around... the temptation has to be HUGE to crack one open and be the first to let the cat outta the bag.



    I think WWDC is being transformed into a event to reward developers... reveal an amazing piece of hardware to developers and it's gotta generate excitement for a very important part of Apple's plan.
  • Reply 203 of 770
    netromacnetromac Posts: 863member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by chu_bakka

    So do we think we'll see a leaked photo the week before WWDC? EVERYONE save it to your hard drive because if I miss it I'll be pissed.



    I always do
  • Reply 204 of 770
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by NETROMac

    I always do



    Yep, me too but then again I tend to live on these types of boards...



    Dave
  • Reply 205 of 770
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    I check the boards constantly too. Which I check while at work. At home is another story... dial-up and a PPC 7500... I KNOW. So I dont' even bother... which leaves me missing the latest greatest buzz... See what happens when you hold out for 3 years waiting for the NEXT tower to come out.



    Maybe the wait will be over this summer.
  • Reply 206 of 770
    netromacnetromac Posts: 863member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by chu_bakka

    I check the boards constantly too. Which I check while at work. At home is another story... dial-up and a PPC 7500... I KNOW. So I dont' even bother... which leaves me missing the latest greatest buzz... See what happens when you hold out for 3 years waiting for the NEXT tower to come out.



    Maybe the wait will be over this summer.




    Three years??? Wasn't the 7500 discontinued in 1996 ??? That's seven years
  • Reply 207 of 770
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    Well I got good use out of it for 3 years... Thought about getting a new machine for a year... but got one at work... then got a fast DSL connection at work... so haven't really needed a new machine that badly... but now I wanna learn Final Cut Pro and get to play with all the OSX goodness.



    I have a scsi scanner and an Apple printer too! anyone want them? Probably will keep the monitor and toss the Mac.
  • Reply 208 of 770
    kidredkidred Posts: 2,402member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by chu_bakka

    So do we think we'll see a leaked photo the week before WWDC? EVERYONE save it to your hard drive because if I miss it I'll be pissed. Ya know... one of those deals where it's up for a couple of hours... there's a huge buzz then Apple gets it pulled. Then I hit the boards and I'm like... what PHOTO?!







    If it is leaked, it will be loudly ravaged as an utter fake and photoshop second-rate job that everyone on these boards could easily out produce.
  • Reply 209 of 770
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    That's why I trust a simple black on white line drawing or schematic. It's either right or wrong. It's not pretending to be a photo... and you don't debate whether it has been retouched or not.



    but the leaked photos real or not are always fun.
  • Reply 210 of 770
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by KidRed

    If it is leaked, it will be loudly ravaged as an utter fake and photoshop second-rate job that everyone on these boards could easily out produce.



    Exactly!



    In fact, I'm still waiting for an insider with some wit to take a clandestine picture of an Apple machine, do a pretty good job of mocking it up in PS based on the pictures, and post it.



  • Reply 211 of 770
    ensign pulverensign pulver Posts: 1,193member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by sCreeD

    (Not FH but definitely WWDC):



    The Naked Mole Rat reports that Apple has turned a cadre of their developers into Elite Project Builder Evangelistas to convert the masses to 64-bit-ness. Many of those TBA slots will be allocated to PB64.



    (Lord, listen to me... I sound like Herr Rat)



    No mention of hardware, but... then what would they develop/test on, hmm??



    Screed




    No mention of hardware? How 'bout this?



    "Apple is likely to promote the newly 64-bit-capable version of Project Builder as the quintessential vehicle for developing Mac OS X applications that tap the capabilities of the new breed of Power Macs based on IBM?s PowerPC 970 processor."



    Sounds like a direct confirmation of 970 Power Macs to me.
  • Reply 212 of 770
    netromacnetromac Posts: 863member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Ensign Pulver

    No mention of hardware? How 'bout this?



    "Apple is likely to promote the newly 64-bit-capable version of Project Builder as the quintessential vehicle for developing Mac OS X applications that tap the capabilities of the new breed of Power Macs based on IBM?s PowerPC 970 processor."



    Sounds like a direct confirmation of 970 Power Macs to me.




    Indeed it does
  • Reply 213 of 770
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    Well, OK then. The odds that the 970 will be a feature of WWDC just got better (not that I thought they were bad).



    NMR basically says they'll be announced there (because Apple will have to publish the names of the TBA conferences at some point, and the cat will be out of the bag), but he says nothing about the machines being released there. So they're obviously imminent, but it's hard to say more than that.



    Curiously, no-one else is backing up MacBidouille. They've pulled scoops before, so they could be right, but it's still interesting to watch. Normally that kind of information spreads through the rumor community like wildfire.
  • Reply 214 of 770
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    Hot damn.



    Confirmed:



    Between 1 and 3 months from now:



    Macintosh the NeXT Generation.
  • Reply 215 of 770
    bigcbigc Posts: 1,224member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by keyboardf12

    Hot damn.



    Confirmed:



    Between 1 and 3 months from now:



    Macintosh the NeXT Generation.




    Could meld two TV shows together with a transparent aluminum PowerPC case.
  • Reply 216 of 770
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    Just as long as phill schiller doesn't take the role of the "Crusher Boy"...
  • Reply 217 of 770
    snoopysnoopy Posts: 1,901member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Amorph





    . . . he says nothing about the machines being released there [at WWDC]. So they're obviously imminent, but it's hard to say more than that. . .







    I'll go out on a limb and say that Apple must be going to introduce 970 PowerMacs by WWDC. If I'm off base on this, surely everyone will let me know. When Apple introduces the 64-bit Panther OS and says to developer, "Go make 64-bit application," the developers will want to know what hardware these applications will run on. Will it be servers, special high-end workstations or everyday pro Power Macs? Developers need to know the market(s) they are making 64-bit applications for. They may like to know what processor is being used too, but if nobody writes machine code these days it may not be important.



    There just doesn't seem to be any good way to pussy foot around Apple announcing 64-bit hardware by WWDC. If there is, please let me know.
  • Reply 218 of 770
    ensign pulverensign pulver Posts: 1,193member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by snoopy

    There just doesn't seem to be any good way to pussy foot around Apple announcing 64-bit hardware at WWDC.



    There isn't. Steve must personally demo 970 based Power Macs at WWDC. The only question is whether they'll be prototypes or the actual retail boxes with immediate availability. I'm betting on the former, but hoping for the latter.
  • Reply 219 of 770
    jccbinjccbin Posts: 476member
    Apple may not reveal the TBA items until the WWDC keynote, if then. Remember, technically, this is all subject to NDA - meaning they don't have to reveal the TBA content publicly to anyone NOT attending WWDC.
  • Reply 220 of 770
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    I think an important thing to find out is if alot of press has been invited to the Keynote. The press doesn't really need to be there for a demo of Panther.
Sign In or Register to comment.