Yeah, judging by 9 to 5's accuracy recently it may very well be called MacBook Air. If it is that name is will be weird as no one on the planet predicted that one.
Maybe they perfected that waterproof membrane that will allow the system to vent air more efficiently too thus reducing the size of heatsinks, removing fans, and thereby allowing for a less complex design and a faster processor to be used.
I would suggest that everybody disregard this guy (Wilco). Obviously he is either an idiot or a couple of points above, and really just gets his kicks demonstrating his benign lack of intelligence. Best way to handle his kind, ignore them.
I've worried about him for a while. He has sounded like he's been on a s-l-o-w simmer.... passive-aggressive beyond belief.
Hopefully, he'll have some time to reflect during his exile.
Wow, you can already feel the energy and excitement for MacWorld 2008! Hopefully I'll be able to attend next year, Lord willing but I'll be quite happy to follow along in real time here, at MacLife and CNET.
I hate articles like that. They make a sensationalist assumption based on the word 'air' and state it as fact. Apple doesn't have a 3G iPhone or any cell tech HW in any Mac prosuct but we are supposed to believe that the company that waits for a new technology, that it can't control, have a solid infrastructure before Apple adopts it.
I've got it! Apple is going to come up with a product which allows ANY electronic device to have wireless capeablity, such as your camera, your printer, your speekers, your headphones, your ipod, your dvd player, your VHS player, your brand new Storage device, anything, and that's becaouse "it's in the air", and whatever it is, it can now be wireless!
That's not Apple, the company appears to be owned by Cascade Communications going by the support email on this page, but it's hard to pull up details on it. It's definitely not Apple though.
The FCC doesn't give a damn about who's big or small and they're not going to bother to separate them into 2 different PDFs which would only serve as a waste of time, space, and resources.
Sebastian
Actually the link you added brought up a pdf named DA-07-5030A3 not A2
more i think about it, it's got to be an ultra portable. cross between iphone and macbook. like a supersized iphone with full os x functions and, let's say, 10" touch screen. with wifi and possibly cell/edge/3g features, "something in the air" makes more sense. at least, i hope it is.
Apple tv shouldn't be a box! It should be a cinema display with built in apple tv capabilities. This way you don't have to add another box in the living room. And the screen would pick up any signal from your macbook - iMac - iPhone - iPod ?
Also, one would not need any wires to connect your macbook to the cinema display.
Apple tv shouldn't be a box! It should be a cinema display with built in apple tv capabilities. This way you don't have to add another box in the living room. And the screen would pick up any signal from your macbook - iMac - iPhone - iPod ?
Also, one would not need any wires to connect your macbook to the cinema display.
That has been discussed before. The problem with Apple developing TVs is that there are many different sizes and types that consumers want. Many people also tend to update their components well before they update their TV.
Comments
Thanks.
Yeah, judging by 9 to 5's accuracy recently it may very well be called MacBook Air. If it is that name is will be weird as no one on the planet predicted that one.
Maybe they perfected that waterproof membrane that will allow the system to vent air more efficiently too thus reducing the size of heatsinks, removing fans, and thereby allowing for a less complex design and a faster processor to be used.
…
I would suggest that everybody disregard this guy (Wilco). Obviously he is either an idiot or a couple of points above, and really just gets his kicks demonstrating his benign lack of intelligence. Best way to handle his kind, ignore them.
I've worried about him for a while. He has sounded like he's been on a s-l-o-w simmer.... passive-aggressive beyond belief.
Hopefully, he'll have some time to reflect during his exile.
Check this out from PhoneNews.com: http://www.phonenews.com/rumor-macwo...to-wimax-2570/
I hate articles like that. They make a sensationalist assumption based on the word 'air' and state it as fact. Apple doesn't have a 3G iPhone or any cell tech HW in any Mac prosuct but we are supposed to believe that the company that waits for a new technology, that it can't control, have a solid infrastructure before Apple adopts it.
Thanks.
Yeah, judging by 9 to 5's accuracy recently it may very well be called MacBook Air.
If that is indeed the name it will be very weird as no one on the planet predicted that one. Not even me
How about the "AirBook" ...?
How about the "AirBook" ...?
No, its too close to iBook, and thats a dirty word in my opinion... (curse you iBook of Horror!)
How about MacAir and the MacAir Pro
or iAir
"Today we are releasing the iRack..."
Can anyone site a time when Apple turned the banner tag line of an event into the name of a product?
Does it really matter at this point? We'll find out Tuesday, and likely be dissapointed.
Sharing wifi with others, e.g., the public, or within the confines of one's personal domain is certainly the way of the future.
We got a winner!
That's not Apple, the company appears to be owned by Cascade Communications going by the support email on this page, but it's hard to pull up details on it. It's definitely not Apple though.
You linked to the exact same list that I did.
My link: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-07-5030A2.pdf
Your link: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-07-5030A2.pdf
The FCC doesn't give a damn about who's big or small and they're not going to bother to separate them into 2 different PDFs which would only serve as a waste of time, space, and resources.
Sebastian
Actually the link you added brought up a pdf named DA-07-5030A3 not A2
With XOhm only in a couple of places so far, Clearwire looks like a better WiMax solution, for now.
Like other posters said, The FON rumor looks like a better possibility.
Also, one would not need any wires to connect your macbook to the cinema display.
Apple tv shouldn't be a box! It should be a cinema display with built in apple tv capabilities. This way you don't have to add another box in the living room. And the screen would pick up any signal from your macbook - iMac - iPhone - iPod ?
Also, one would not need any wires to connect your macbook to the cinema display.
That has been discussed before. The problem with Apple developing TVs is that there are many different sizes and types that consumers want. Many people also tend to update their components well before they update their TV.