davidlewis54

About

Username
davidlewis54
Joined
Visits
45
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
158
Badges
0
Posts
90
  • Apple TV+ at six months: No breakthroughs, but plenty of promise

    I have subscribed to Apple TV since it first launched in the UK at £4.99 a month.  We have watched at least one series each month which seems good value. Certainly the quality has been very good as far as I am concerned though these things are always a question of taste.
    Beats
  • Jimmy Iovine reveals what's wrong with streaming music, talks Steve Jobs

    Other parts of the problem are the disposable nature of streaming.  In the ‘old days’ we would buy an LP, cassette or CD and play it all the way through. Some tracks would be better than others, but generally, the order of the tracks dictated what the artist wanted the listener to hear as a whole. Now, a lot of streaming is of single tracks. This defeats part of the artist’s endeavours and to some extent loses the soul of the production. Historically, a recording would be revisited a number of times over many years.  With streaming this doesn’t happen: a new recording arrives, a few tracks are listened to a few times and then deleted.  It hardly makes for an artist to create his or her greatest work. Streaming also produces far less income for the artist.
    d_2dysamoria
  • Apple sued over atrial fibrillation optical sensor in Apple Watch

    In the late 1960s I wrote a story for school homework.  This included a data collection device being a small silver disc on which the data was stored.  Can I claim royalties for every CD, DVD and Blu-ray which has been made? 
    StrangeDays
  • Apple offering week of App Store freebies for the holidays

    This will, no doubt, start the plethora of complaints as we had before and I don’t blame Apple for stopping it.  Oh, yes, comment Number 2: that didn’t take long, did it? 
    ronnJaiOh81StrangeDays
  • Apple Arcade may cost $4.99 per month to access iOS games

    dysamoria said:
    Getting sick of company after company pushing subscription models. I will not participate. I can not afford to participate. The “low rates” are a trap for people who don’t see how small bills add up.

    Every damned media company wants to have people subscribing to their own video streaming service. Do you know how many of these there are now? There are still more coming.

    Now there are subscription services for gaming and anyone who doesn’t know how messed-up the game developer industry is right now should go inform themselves. Between the gambling mechanics and the employee abuse, it’s become a total dumpster fire. I’m sure subscription models won’t help anyone because we see how the push for constant garbage materials for micro-transactions keeps the stress on developers even after the product has supposedly shipped.

    Many if not most software developers are jumping on the subscription model too. It’s not just business tools (which people seem to think are justified: “if you can’t afford to subscribe, you don’t need the software”, apologists will say). It hurts hobbyists and small businesses who rely on software tools, but the corporate-boot-lickers don’t care about people and won’t tolerate criticism.

    At this point, average consumers may find themselves subscribed to multiple non-utility-classed services every month (phone, cable, internet, several video streaming services, music streaming services, maybe some apps on their phones) on top of their monthly utilities bills and other expenses.

    The people with content-creation hobbies will have even more (music creation tools, Adobe products, video products, 3D modeling & rendering packages, etc).

    Then the people who are also gamers may have even more, now that access to gaming itself is being pushed as a “service”.

    It doesn’t matter if you think 5-15 bucks is a small amount. That’s the point. They all add up, and the push to normalize this is increasing.

    This market trend is not good for consumers whatsoever. It is a trend *because* of the fact that it IS abusive; just like the micro-transactions in gaming. It is end-stage capitalism’s latest effort to use psychological manipulation to squeeze more blood from the stone that is saturated markets and purchase-averse/financially-troubled consumers.
    Ultimately, it’s up to each individual to work out if it can afford a subscription.  It’s the same as any shopping: if you can’t afford it you don’t buy it and charging for it is not the suppliers’ fault. 
    lollivermuthuk_vanalingammatrix077watto_cobra