jdw

About

Username
jdw
Joined
Visits
256
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2,936
Badges
1
Posts
1,464
  • Apple CEO Tim Cook personally invested $1 million in Trump's inauguration

    mattinoz said:
    Total votes 152,319,830
    population  346,388,480 people 

    So more than half didn’t vote for anyone.
    they each got more than a 1/5 but less than a 1/4.

    Sure a 1/3 are generally underage or otherwise in capable.
    still at 80mill non voters are still the next biggest group after the young. 
    I think it's best to flesh out the numbers a bit more when engaging in these numerical discussions..

    As of January 1, 2025, the population of the United States was 341,145,670, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. So it's clear the number depends on your source.  But both your number and mine aren't too terrible different.

    Total number of votes cast as of today seems to be 155,211,283 as per this source. But counting is still ongoing.

    Voting Age population has been estimated by one source to be 78%, which is roughly: 266,092,623 people.
    So based on that number, if accurate, the turnout rate for the Nov. '24 election would be 
    58.3%.

    Other estimates of the number of 18 and older people in the US peg it at 
    260,046,087 people.
    If that number is accurate, then the turnout rate for the Presidential election would be 59.7%.

    The turnout rate among eligible voters according to BallotPedia was 63.7%.

    To dive deeper into the numbers, you'd need to consider the mentally ill, physically ill and those otherwise incapable of voting, subtracting them from the 18 and older group, then recalculate the figures.  For example, ChatGPT estimates 5 to 7% of the 18-and-older population may be incapable of voting at all, which if true would be 
    15,602,765 people. Recalculating the Turnout Rate among the general population shows the number in that case to be 63.5%.

    What that tells me is that a very significant and sizable percentage of the US population able to vote did in fact vote.

    Not that any of that really matters too much in terms of what Tim Cook PERSONALLY did in terms of making a monetary contribution to President-elect Trump.
    mattinoz
  • First M4 Max benchmark tears apart the M2 Ultra Mac Studio

    Galfan said:
    My god…..I was thinking when I purchased my M1 Max 16 inch I would be fine for 4-5 years but this might consider me upgrading this year….also because I noticed the GPU is hitting the limit sometimes but also that with my new function I need more headroom for bigger projects with the CPU.
    I too have an M1 Max 16" MBP and I edit 10-bit 4K videos in FCPX, but I've not run up against performance issues that necessitate an upgrade.  Sure, the extra speed of the M4 Max would be fun, but it's not an absolute necessity.  Perhaps when they release the M5, they'll finally have WIFI 7 support, and then it may be time to pull the trigger on a purchase.  Maybe by then they will finally add FaceID and make the notch much more useful.
    Alex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Apple is reportedly not investing in OpenAI

    As I've mentioned under other articles in the past, my experience with ChatGPT4o isn't that great.  I want like to use it to check multiple online sources quickly, in the hope it can Google faster than I can on my own.  And it is fast.  But the problem is, it lies a lot.  So I always ask it for sources.  Then it gives me stupid links that when clicked on, open nothing.  So I have to then as it for plain text URLs.  It complies, but none of them ever work.  EVER!  They lead to the expected domain, but they always result a 404 file not found.  ALWAYS!  I then complain to ChatGPT saying it needs to read the articles it links for me to ensure the article truly exists and exists at the plain text URL it will give to me.  It apologizes and seemingly complies, but it continues to give me more bogus URLs.  I have repeated that cycle multiple times in a row, until my free sessions with GPT4o expires.  It never learns from its mistakes.  It never gets it right.  I've been using it for months, and it hasn't improved at all in that regard.  So I mostly find it useless.  And this experience remains valid even if some GPT lover comes along a raves about how well it summarizes text.  Fine and well, but it still lies and gives bogus URLs to its source info.  

    This is why I won't shed many tears when and if OpenAI finally goes under.  There was so much promise with their creation.  But they've not done anything I can see to show it's worthy of sticking around when the funds run dry.  Let a better company come along and do an actual good job on AI for once.  Whether that can be Apple or not is yet to be seen.  Apple did come out with Apple Maps despite the global love for Google Maps, so you never know.  They may release their own ChatGPT style AI chatbot one day, with true intelligence that doesn't lie and gives working URLs.
    muthuk_vanalingamforgot usernamewatto_cobra
  • J.D. Vance shouldn't open his mouth about Apple if he doesn't have a clue

    All information is biased and underneath is some basis in truth unless the source is outright lying. Hiding from sources you disagree with because you don't like the truth doesn't make you clever. It makes you ignorant and if anything, more biased. The only news sources you have left are conspiracy theorists and people willing to say anything to line their pockets.

    Whatever you believe, I wouldn't side with the ones actively trying to remove rights from its own citizens in the so-called "land of the free." White cis men with middle class or better incomes might have fared better under Trump, but no one else did. Women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and people of color's rights all suffered, and things would only get worse as Trump plans to attack child care, health care, social security, and retirement because he and his see government assistance as "socialism."

    The only ones that benefit from Trump are rich stock holders and business owners, which thanks to systemic racism, is majority white.

    I used to respect the Republican Party until it died and was replaced by the racist, hate filled MAGA extremists. There's nothing left of the old party. Just brainless sycophants that can't say anything bad about Trump on TV or else get razed on the failed Truth Social by the man on his gold toilet watching Fox News.

    If me wanting to see a better America where all of its citizens can prosper no matter their race, religion, or gender is "leftist propaganda," I'd hate to see what people think the country should be like. It's time for us to love our neighbor and mind our own damn business.

    BTW: The people talking about the pet thing, it's a proven hoax. The person initially spreading the lie said they never had firsthand knowledge of anyone doing it. The so-called secret bodycam footage is old and from an incident that didn't occur in Springfield nor did it involve an immigrant of any kind. Talk about propaganda, the pet eating stuff is classic racist nonsense meant to drive people to hate a specific group of people. It dehumanizes the group so you don't feel so bad when you drive them from their homes. But I suppose it's hard to know the facts if you ignore all the sources that report the news.
    This is my rebuttal to Wesley and to the 12 people who clicked Like on his post in support of what he wrote.

    That defensive argument, written by a journalist, saying that "all info is biased" is poppycock in that not all info is EQUALLY BIASED!  That is key.  Anyone who read and properly understood my earlier post about the bulk of American "journalism" (which is often more "entertainment" than true journalism), is so biased it falls into the category of "propaganda."  Yes, the same term we use for the government-controlled news media of North Korea.

    Next, the statement that says "hiding from sources you disagree with because you don't like the truth" is also poppycock for the same reason.  Such a ridiculous statement can basically be used to chastise anyone who refuses to listen to North Korea state media because those folks are somehow "hiding from the truth."

    As I said, most mainstream media in America has a strong Liberal Left slant to it.  But even the news which is on the right is also strongly biased.  This wasn't always the way the media in the USA behaved.  It has slowly grown to be this way over time.  And no surprises, really.  Media outlets are for profit businesses that get higher ratings and more viewers when then feed their readership's/viewership's baser instincts (bad news and controversy attracts more flies than good news), so they are constantly driven to say the outrageous and thereby inflame the passions of a populace which is already polarized beyond words.

    My desire to avoid news sources that dish out fodder for fools doesn't make me a fool or more biased. For example, I don't need to better my life by researching every aspect of mass murder in order to know murder in general is wrong.  We can be highly selective about what news sources we view and still be a sufficiently-informed and respectable human being.

    So to argue that I should in fact be reading or watching MSNBC (and the like) for an objective take on conservative Republicans (for example) is laughably ridiculous.  Equally ridiculous would be for me to investigate an objective take on Kamala Harris by way of FOX news.  Even so, with the vast majority American media outlets being predominantly left/liberal, it's impossible to not get fed some of their propaganda from time to time, even when trying to avoid it.

    As to "conspiracy theorists and people willing to say anything to line their pockets," according to your "we shouldn't hide our eyes" philosophy, it would appear you would want us to read that stupidity too.  At least, it would seem we should, if in fact your advice is 100% consistent.  But because I dislike your advice, I shall make attempts to hide my eyes from those crazies as well.  And don't get me started on the Flat Earth nutcases!

    Your use of "cis men" reveals your political biases rather clearly. Your post also attacks Trump rather forcefully.  That tells me that future articles written by you here on AppleInsider will be infused with your strong biases when it comes to political matters.  

    Whether we like it or not, nearly half of American voters seem willing to vote Mr. T. this November, so whenever I see people slamming the x-President, I see them also slamming every voter interested in supporting the man for President.  Of course, you did more than just that, Wesley.  You labeled nearly half of America (those wanting to vote for Trump) as "MAGA extremists."  That sort of callous brashness is precisely why America has become so polarized.  

    Lastly, you ended your post on "the pet hoax," but the reality is that the so-called moderators of the second Presidential debate sought to moderate only Mr. Trump with real-time fact checking, and they did not call out the Vice President on anything she said which was an untruth.  That leaves the viewer to believe everything she said was truth.  And this is why real-time fact checking only really works to inflame passions, rather than inform.  Interjecting fact-checking for only one of the two candidates is yet another example of bias intended to swaying voter opinion.  It's therefore rather amusing so many have expressed past concerns about Russia or foreign election interference, when the US mass media does more to impact the vote than any other organization or government on earth.

    So how do we dispense with that all that negativity and follow the sage advice of Rodney King in order to "get along"?  Well, we must first discard the bad advice which tells us to view all sources of news equally.  Indeed, if we all turned off our TVs and stopping gobbling down every piece of so-called "news" cast in our direction, we would be friendlier and happier over all.  We would have fewer accusations to make against others.  Of course, having a heart of compassion and love for our fellow man is key to getting along too.  But much of the time, our love waxes cold when we allow our eyes and minds to be fed with "propaganda" prancing around as "news."

    If "a house divided cannot stand," and I believe that to be truth, what hope is there of America in the long run if we don't seek to shelter our thoughts and minds from bad things and fill our minds with good?  Therefore, let us be highly selective about what we consume, and seek to treat our neighbor with the same love and respect as we would want them to direct toward us.
    RobJenk
  • Upcoming M4-based Mac mini rumored to replace USB-A with more USB-C ports

    Marvin said:
    Keeping support for it on computers is what keeps manufacturers making the products with USB-A. 
    You and I and everybody else in this thread are mainly talking about Apple here, not the PC world.  And even when we talk about PCs, we're talking to eachother — Apple users.  Since the world is dominated by Windoze (proper spelling) PCs, what goes on in that dark and silly world impacts us in the Mac world.  For that reason (and despite the silly remarks of Chasm), USB-A really is here to stay, whether we like it or not.  And even though you did say "All computer manufacturers should start dropping USB-A," what we say in this forum doesn't dictate what the Pee See (correct spelling) world will do, nor will a decision by Apple to drop all USB-A ports on the Mac Mini dictate what the Windoze PC world will do.  And so, if only Apple is dropping USB-A, and if we still are blasted with USB-A devices for years to come, the need for a USB-A port to avoid another STUPID DONGLE is key.

    By the way, I just bought the single best 1TB Thumbdrive SSD today on Amazon only 1 hour ago, and guess what?  The connector only comes in USB-A.  Check it out too, because it beats any other thumb drive out there.  Pretty incredible.  And yeah, I'll need to use a STUPID DONGLE with it on my 16" M1 Max MBP, although my 2015 5K iMac at the office can accept USB-A without dongles.  I may buy a Mac Mini in the near future, so all this talk has meaning for me.  I would buy an M4 Mini with or without a USB-A port, but I would be FAR HAPPIER with it.  And honestly, it doesn't matter to me of the rest of you feel differently.  I buy things for my own satisfaction, not any of yours.

    And there you have it.
    muthuk_vanalingamRobJenkwatto_cobra