Thinking aint doing much fer you either, Einstein.
There's nothing tiring about spewing vitriol on a convicted monopolist that can't innovate but can copyvate.
Shrugs. Keep the trollware coming...you're in for a beating sooner or later...
Lemon Bon Bon.
[CENTER]Really... 'copyvate' ?
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
Comments
I never claimed microsoft termed it.
I'm not claiming Microsoft termed slate either. I'm simply asking for a slate vis-Ã*-vis Microsoft reference prior to yesterday.
The slate still has the Windows task bar at the bottom. How original. Welcome to the bold new world of tablet computing. What a Phailnote.
[CENTER]Really... Phailnote? LOL! [/CENTER]
Thinking aint doing much fer you either, Einstein.
There's nothing tiring about spewing vitriol on a convicted monopolist that can't innovate but can copyvate.
Shrugs. Keep the trollware coming...you're in for a beating sooner or later...
Lemon Bon Bon.
[CENTER]Really... 'copyvate' ?
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
http://img.tomshardware.com/us/2003/...pad/compaq.jpg
See What I Did There?
I used FACT not fan(aticism) to make my point, maybe you should follow suit.
[/CENTER]
[CENTER]Really... 'copyvate' ?
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
http://img.tomshardware.com/us/2003/...pad/compaq.jpg
See What I Did There?
I used FACT not fan(aticism) to make my point, maybe you should follow suit.
[/CENTER]
on a company that does not exist...perhaps because of said device....
or probably their entire line of Pre-sorry Yos...Yea there were pre-sorry...
it seems HP slate will sell as well as those compaq TXnothings....
[CENTER]Really... 'copyvate' ?
This from someone who so openly lauds a comany whose flagship device's ' innovative design' is little more than scaled-down replica of the Hp/Compaq TX1xxx circa 2001
http://img.tomshardware.com/us/2003/...pad/compaq.jpg
See What I Did There?
I used FACT not fan(aticism) to make my point, maybe you should follow suit.
[/CENTER]
Facts? Point? By claiming the iPhone is "little more" than a scaled down Compaq slate?
Has the non-appearance of your beloved, Apple-crushing, game changing, "what are you gonna do now?" Courier sent you off the deep end?
BTW, MS didn't have a word to say about sales of the world beating, breath taking, this-changes-everything Zune HD. Wonder why that is?
http://www.verbatimit.com
That's it, that's all.
Alan Kelly, owner/operator
802-578-3789
There's nothing tiring about spewing vitriol on a convicted monopolist that can't innovate but can copyvate.
Lemon Bon Bon.
And that comes from admirer of Steve Jobs, who will not give anyone access to his little barb-wired ecosystem.
OK...