macgui

About

Username
macgui
Joined
Visits
202
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,038
Badges
1
Posts
2,547
  • watchOS 11.4 was briefly available, and was pulled by Apple [u]

    I thought Silent Mode silences everything but alarms and haptics. Even Do Not Disturb doesn't silence alarms. If set they go off and you have to silence them. So maybe this toggle does (more)
    Applejacs
  • Apple's MagSafe isn't going anywhere

    Xed said:
    sloth77 said:
    Xed said:
    (more)
    MplsPmuthuk_vanalingamgrandact73
  • Crime blotter: Teenaged Apple Store robber agrees to pay security guards

    gustav said:
    (more)
    We only know what the media tells us. The evidence could end up being fake, or it could end up being a case of mistaken identity, etc. It's dangerous to label someone a criminal or perpetrator when we only have a third hand account of evidence. Just ask Richard Jewell (google him)
    Read the rest of the paragraph:

    ”Ultimately, the victim was able to ping the iPad and notify officers of the suspect's location, leading to his arrest, although he did resist it. He was charged with vehicle theft, possession of a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property, burglary and resisting arrest with violence.”

    The perpetrator was charged with crimes. He isn’t a suspect. Richard Jewell (who I don’t need to google) WAS a suspect. He ended up not being charged because there was no evidence that he did it. That’s where the word “suspect” makes sense. This is not one of those cases. 
    Until convicted in court he's an alleged perpetrator and a suspect. Media is aware of this and the liability of printing something that isn't proven in a court of law. The idea is to prevent "trying the case it the media" because of the tenet that everyone is innocent until proven guilty when charged with a crime. Words matter. What you maintain is about an arrestee's status is factually incorrect. Police charge innocent people all the time. Charging someone doesn't mean any more than an authority believing someone has committed a crime. They have to prove it even if they caught someone in the commission of a crime.

    Police arresting and charging someone with a crime doesn't make them guilty unless and until it's proven in court. However that doesn't stop any individual from believing what ever they want. Those beliefs may or may not  be correct. Some people believe that whatever they believe is fact. The court systems aren't perfect but they're better than acting solely on someone's arbitrary belief systems.
    muthuk_vanalingamronnwatto_cobra
  • John Giannandrea out as Siri chief, Apple Vision Pro lead in

     the lack of progress on Siri has
    (more)
    decoderringSmittyWwilliamlondonbyronlstarof80Alex1NelijahgHedwarewatto_cobra
  • EU will force Apple to totally expose its iPhone features to all who ask

    An iOSeu restricted to the eu might work but I don't know that Apple could do it without giving up proprietary IP. If so that could be a way to go. I'd like to know how just dropping the (more)
    Alex1Njas99apple4thewinlotoneswatto_cobra